Vaccines that work for all

Today is the first day of the World Health Organization's ‘World Immunisation Week'. William Murray looks at the details for commonspace.eu

As the world faces a health crisis like never before, the importance of vaccines and immunisation has never been clearer. Today (24/04) marks the beginning of the World Health Organization's World Immunisation Week, which seeks to bring attention to the importance of vaccination around the world. Vaccines contain small parts of diseases, and when introduced to the body, stimulate its immune system to produce the antibodies that lead to immunity. Since their development in the last century, vaccines are credited with having led to the elimination of many formerly common diseases, such as polio, and saving countless lives.

The theme of this year's campaign is ‘#VaccinesWork for All' and will focus on "how vaccines - and the people who develop, deliver and receive them - are heroes by working to protect the health of everyone, everywhere" [1]. The main objectives of this year's campaign are to:

• "Demonstrate the value of vaccines for the health of children, communities and the world.
• Show how routine immunization is the foundation for strong, resilient health systems and universal health coverage.
• Highlight the need to build on immunization progress while addressing gaps, including through increased investment in vaccines and immunization." [2]

Despite the near-universal scientific acceptance of the benefits of immunisation, there remains a small but vocal community of anti-vaccination campaigners (‘anti-vaxers'). These groups and individuals dispute the benefits of vaccination, with many purporting ill-founded links between vaccination and autism [3] and that the global push for immunisation is a conspiracy fuelled by profit-driven drug companies [4]. Whilst experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have openly listed vaccination as one of the top-ten great public health achievements of the last century [5], last year, the growth of anti-vaccination narratives prompted the WHO to officially place what it calls ‘vaccine hesitancy' in its list of the ten greatest threats to global health [6]. In the face of overwhelming evidence for the safety and importance of vaccination, the ‘anti-vax' movement has been fuelled by a widely discredited paper by disgraced British former-doctor, Andrew Wakefield [7], and endorsement by certain celebrity figures, such as actors Jessica Biel and Jim Carrey [8].

In light of the ongoing pandemic, certain anti-vaccine ‘truthers' have gone as far to suggest that COVID-19 itself is a lie to accelerate the uptake of harmful vaccines [9]. However, whilst some campaigners are ‘doubling down' on their narratives, evidence suggests the pandemic has led others to reassess their beliefs. Studies in the UK between March and April have shown a reduction in the number of people that would refuse a vaccine from 7% to 5%, thought to have been prompted by the growing COVID-19 death toll [10]. Last week, the WHO announced that there are 70 different coronavirus vaccines currently under development (three already being tested in human trials), with drug makers attempting to compress the normal 10-15 years it takes for a vaccine to get to a market to just one [11]

We, at commonspace.eu, join the WHO, the scientific community, and the rest of the world in celebrating the hard work done by those seeking new vaccines, and the importance of immunisation, especially during the current crisis.

Source: William Murray, Project Officer and Coordinator at LINKS Europe, for commonspace.eu

Featured Sources:

[1] The WHO - ‘Theme: #VaccinesWork for All': https://www.who.int/news-room/campaigns/world-immunization-week/world-immunization-week-2020/key-messages

[2] The WHO - ‘World Immunization Week 2020': https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2020/04/24/default-calendar/world-immunization-week-2020

[3] CDC - ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism': https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html

[4] STAT - ‘Pharma's tarnished reputation helps fuel the anti-vaccine movement': https://www.statnews.com/2019/02/26/anti-vaccine-movement-pharma-tarnished-reputation/

[5] CDC - ‘Ten Great Public Health Achievements -- United States, 1900-1999': https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056796.htm

[6] The WHO - ‘Ten threats to global health in 2019': https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019

[7] T. S. Sathyanarayana Rao, Chittaranjan Andrade - ‘The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud': https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/

[8] Rolling Stone - ‘A Guide to 17 Anti-Vaccination Celebrities': https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/celebrities-anti-vaxxers-jessica-biel-847779/

[9] Mother Jones - ‘"A Fake Pandemic": Anti-Vaxxers Are Spreading Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories': https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/03/a-fake-pandemic-antivaxxers-are-spreading-coronavirus-conspiracy-theories/

[10] The Guardian - ‘Coronavirus causing some anti-vaxxers to waver, experts say': https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/21/anti-vaccination-community-divided-how-respond-to-coronavirus-pandemic

[11] TIME - ‘70 Coronavirus Vaccines Are Under Development, With 3 in Human Trials, WHO Says': https://time.com/5819887/coronavirus-vaccines-development-who/

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)