ODIHR issues interim report on forthcoming presidential elections in Azerbaijan

Inaccuracy of the voters list, restrictive political environment, and absence of a genuinely competitive contest, were some of the issues raised by interlocoteurs of the OSCE-ODIHR Election Observation Mission ahead of the forthcoming presidential election in Azerbaijan, according to the Mission's interim report published on 29 March.

ODIHR -  the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the OSCE has deployed an Election Observation Mission (EOM) on the forthcoming presidential elections in Azerbaijan which will be held on 11 April 2018. The Mission opened with a press conference in Baku on 9 March.  The Head of Mission is Corien Jonker from The Netherlands. The Mission consists of a core team made up of 10 staff from 7 participating States and 30 long-term observers seconded from participating states who are deployed throughout the country.

The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe have announced that they will deploy observer delegations for election-day observation. The OSCE Chairperson-in-Office has appointed Nilza de Sena as Special Co-ordinator and leader of the short term OSCE observer mission for this election.

The ODIHR EOM interim report flags up a number of issues that the report says were raised during meetings with what it described as the Mission's "interlocoteurs".  These issues can be grouped in three clusters - the legal and administrative framework, the political context, and media reporting and election scrutiny.

The report says that the election is administered by the Central Elections Commission, 125 Constituency Election Commissions (ConECs) and around 5,400 Precinct Election Commissions (PECs).  The report says that "Election commissions appear professional and well-resourced. PECs have been trained."

But the report raises issues regarding the accuracy of the voter's list.  It says:

"Voter lists are available online and were also displayed for public scrutiny. Voters can request corrections. While election officials informed the ODIHR EOM that their efforts led to accurate voter lists, other interlocutors noted a large discrepancy between the number of registered voters and the number of citizens of voting age."

In a footnote the report says that according to data from the State Statistics Committee from 2017 there are more than 7.1 million individuals of voting age. This is nearly two million more than the number of people registered as of 21 March which amounted to 5,192,063.

The report says that ten candidates submitted the necessary paperwork to be registered.  Two were not  registered because they failed to collect enough signatures to be nominated as required by law. They did not appeal this decision. Eight were eventually registered, and will appear on the ballot paper. The report says:

"Many ODIHR EOM interlocutors said they do not expect the election to be genuinely competitive, claiming that those who stand against the incumbent in this election either do not present a political alternative, or even actively support him. Several opposition parties are calling for a boycott of the  election, saying that they will not participate in an election that takes place in what they consider a non-competitive environment. Other parties do not participate in the election arguing that the early election date gives them insufficient time to participate in a meaningful way. ODIHR EOM interlocutors from YAP criticized the reasons provided by the opposition, noting that they would have known that elections would take place at some point in 2018."

It adds,

"Several interlocutors informed the ODIHR EOM about restrictions they face in terms of freedom of assembly and association, and some of them shared that they are under continuous police surveillance."

The report also refers to the issue of Ilgar Mammadov saying that one political movement noted that he "is prevented from running in the election despite judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)".

The report says that whilst "freedom of expression, media freedom and the right of access to information are guaranteed in the Constitution "ODIHR EOM interlocutors have expressed concerns about the number of journalists and bloggers who are currently serving prison sentences on charges that are seemingly unrelated to their professional activities."  The report adds:

"The 11 television stations with nationwide coverage remain the main source of political information in Azerbaijan, while the circulation of the print media continues to decline. Some 80 per cent of population have access to the internet. A number of ODIHR EOM interlocutors expressed a lack of trust in the independence and impartiality of traditional media, claiming that websites and social media are the only sources of critical information."

The report adds:

"The ODIHR EOM noted that a number of websites that provide daily political coverage are generally inaccessible in Baku and the regions."

The report says that "in line with legal requirements, the public broadcaster has allocated free airtime to all contestants. The ODIHR EOM was informed that this time will be used exclusively for one-hour long roundtables among the contestants, which are aired on both TV and radio, three times per week."On election observation the report says that

"the Election Code provides for citizen and international election observation, in line with OSCE commitments. Domestic observers can register to observe individually, or as representatives of candidates, political parties or non-governmental organizations. In addition to observers, candidates can have their own authorized representatives registered by the CEC. The CEC reported that as of 21 March, a total of 48,484 domestic observers had been registered by the ConECs, and 822 by the CEC."

The report notes that

"the Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Center (EMDS) has significant experience in conducting independent and professional observation, both in Azerbaijan and abroad, but remains unregistered and thus without legal status. Therefore, its volunteer observers plan to be accredited individually. Several civil society organizations will engage in election observation and will conduct exit polls."

The full interim report of the OSCE-ODIHR Elections Observation Mission for the Early Presidential Elections in Azerbaijan is available on the OSCE website here

source: commonspace.eu with OSCE.org

photo: Baku - a general view (archive picture)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)