Jordan becomes central to Iranian focus

Four Iranian attacks targeted American troops in Jordan in five days, US officials said, including one on Friday that killed two soldiers and left another missing.

In total, dozens of American servicemen were injured in these attacks, as well as several helicopters were damaged.

The barrage of attacks and the casualties they inflicted indicate that Iranian forces not only still have a sufficient stockpile of missiles, but have also become more adept at evading American air defense systems, American officials said.

The New York Times writes that Jordan, home to major US air bases, has become more important in the run-up to and early days of the war as the Pentagon has moved some troops from Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar to safer locations in Jordan and Israel. The country's role in the US operation has only grown as other US allies in the region have limited Washington's ability to deploy troops and conduct airstrikes on their territory, US officials have said.

US officials have provided a brief overview of the last five days of Iranian attacks on Jordan, which the Pentagon has not yet publicly discussed in detail.

The first attack on US troops in Jordan hit a residential compound at King Faisal Air Base, injuring up to five US service members, they said. A second missile hit a base in eastern Jordan where US Black Hawk helicopters were stationed, significantly damaging some of them.

In addition, Iranian missiles hit Jordan's Muwaffak Salt Air Base in Azraq, the same base where US soldiers were killed on Friday.

The previous strike had injured about 20 American soldiers trying to take shelter in bunkers. No one was killed during that attack.

source: commonspace.eu, with The New York Times (New York) and agencies

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)