Georgia's crazy opinion polls

As Georgia prepares to go to the polls on Saturday, 8 October, questions have again arisen about the reliability of opinion polls, and the possible manipulation of opinion and exit polls by different political forces.

The problem is not new. Opinion polls ahead of the 2012 parliamentary elections proved not only to be unreliable, but outright misleading.

Opinion polls by the American National Democratic Institute ahead of the elections held on 1 October 2012 hugely underestimated the support for the Georgian Dream coalition. In its report dated 7 September 2012 NDI showed Georgian Dream support at 12% (based on respondents likely to vote) against the projected support for the United National Movement at 37% - this according to a poll conducted shortly before the elections. In the election itself the Georgian Dream coalition got 54.97% whilst the UNM got 40.34%. Needless to say the difference between the poll and the actual election result goes far beyond any conceivable margin of error.

The problem persists. Opinion polls published in recent days give completely different pictures.

On 1 October, the pro opposition TV station Rustavi 2 reported on its website:

"According to the GFK conducted research, the National Movement is ahead of Georgian Dream in ratings. When asked which party they would vote for, if they were to take part in the parliamentary elections, the results were as follows - the United National Movement -26%; Then comes the Georgian Dream 25.4%. Just one week before the election, commissioned by Rustavi2 the GFK company conducted public opinion research and published results of the third pre-election poll."

At almost the same time Imedi TV, a pro Georgian Dream station gave a completely different picture. As reported by agenda.ge on 30 September:

"The poll, commissioned by Imedi TV and conducted by the American research firm JPM revealed the current ruling party would win the elections. The Imedi TV poll indicated the current ruling party had the most support from voters. 

The survey asked people who they will vote for. The results showed:  Georgian Dream-Democratic Georgia - 32.7 %; United National Movement - 12.8%"

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "the unreliability of the opinion polls in the past, and the continued exaggerated discrepancies ahead of next Saturday's vote should make political observers very wary on basing their assessments on these polls. As could be seen in recent polls in Britain (ahead of both the General elections and the Brexit referendum), opinion polls are imprecise even in the most sophisticated democracies. In a situation like Georgia they must, at best, be taken with a pinch of salt. What will matter will be the result of the election that will be released by the Central Elections Commission in the early hours of Sunday morning. The Georgian people need to be reassured that it is their vote that matters, not what the opinion polls say".

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Screenshot from a report on opinion poll findings on one of Georgia's tv stations

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)