The Gap between East and West Germany

There is still a wide gap between East and West Germany, writes Marcel Furstenau on the website of the German broadcaster, Deutsche Welle. There is still a wide gap even amongst young people who have only ever lived in a unified country. The new commissioner for eastern Germany, Elisabeth Kaiser, attempts to explain why.

Elisabeth Kaiser is from Gera, in the eastern state of Thuringia. When the federal commissioner for eastern Germany was born in 1987, Germany was still divided. Two years later, the  Berlin Wall fell, and on October 3, 1990, the communist GDR  became history.

"I did not consciously experience the period of reunification, but the stories of my parents and grandparents have shaped me," Kaiser wrote in an annual report presented in Berlin just in time for the 35th anniversary of German Unity Day. For the 38-year-old member of the centre-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) this is a first, as she has only been in office since May 2025, when the new federal government was formed.

In her report, the political scientist focuses on how younger people are experiencing a Germany that has been united for 35 years. Yet the title she gave it hints at the gap between the former west and east, "Growing up in unity?"

Formally, the answer is "yes," because there is now only one German nation.

"We children of the late 1980s and 1990s are the first generation to have been socialized in a unified Germany," Kaiser writes in the report's foreword. "Nevertheless, for young people growing up there, 'the East' is still much more than a compass point. It is a space that shapes identities and influences lives," she stressed.

East German identity 

Kaiser, who studied at the University of Potsdam in the eastern state of Brandenburg sees differences between herself and younger people from former West Germany.

"Many young people... cannot relate to the label 'West German' — especially if they live on the coast or near the Alps. In contrast, young eastern Germans identify themselves as Ossis far more often," she wrote, using a slang term for people from the former East.

Kaiser believes there are good reasons for this. Even though young Germans have all been grown up in the same country for three and a half decades, the conditions of their upbringing still differ in important ways.

"This is especially true outside the eastern German cities," she said.

Lower incomes, more welfare

In her report, Kaiser references a study on equality between the former East and West. It shows that in small towns and rural regions, public transportation and medical facilities are no longer comprehensively guaranteed in eastern states. In addition, people earn below-average incomes and are more likely to be dependent on social benefits.

"Wealth is also lower in the east than in the west," Kaiser added.

"This shapes the lives of many eastern Germans well into adulthood," she wrote, because they are less likely to be able to rely on their parents for financial support throughout their lives.

In addition, the aging of the population in rural regions of eastern Germany is more pronounced than in western areas. The proportion of young people is well below the national average.  

Rich West, poor East 

When presenting her report, Kaiser elaborated on this aspect: "To this day, young people in the east are disadvantaged because wealth is mainly passed on through inheritance," which most east Germans cannot expect.

The figures published by the Federal Statistical Office for 2024 underline this: The tax offices in western states reported more than €106 billion ($124.5 billion) in inherited or gifted wealth. In the east, including Berlin, the figure was less than seven billion. That amounts to almost four times more in the west per capita. Kaiser finds this problematic and believes that a serious debate over changes to inheritance laws may be warranted.

One idea that has been floated is the "inheritance for everyone" proposal first put forward by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) several years ago. This would see all young people in Germany receive an "inheritance" of €20,000 to finance education, start a business or invest in real estate. It would be financed by taxes on larger inheritances.

However, the topic is still unpopular with a lot of conservatives, including some in Chancellor Friedrich Merz Cristian Democratic Union (CDU).

In the end, Kaiser's assessment is a mixed bag. Eastern Germany has developed well in many areas, the economy has grown, there is a vibrant start-up scene, and the region is a pioneer in the expansion of renewable energies.

But in the long run, all this will not be enough to close the gap. And this is likely to become even more difficult to change in the future due to the aging population in the east and the exodus of many young people to the west.

While Berlin's population has not decreased, the east has lost two million people since reunification in 1990 — a decline of 16%. Currently, the five eastern German states still have just under 12.5 million inhabitants.

During the same period, the population in western Germany grew by 10%, to almost 68 million people.

This article was originally written in German.

source: commonspace.eu with Deutche Welle (Cologne)

photo: Elizabeth Kaiser

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)