Decisive day for Armenia (Update 3)

Update 3 at 18.00 GMT

Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the mass popular movement that has swept Armenia over the last weeks, joined thousands of supporters in the centre of the country's capital Yerevan, immediately after his candidature for prime minister was voted down by the Armenian parliament, which is dominated by the current ruling party, the Republican Party.

Pashinyan told thousands of cheering supporters that packed the large square and adjoining streets, that the Republican Party had declared an open confrontation with the people, and called for a general strike to start tomorrow, Monday, 2 May at 8.15 am. Pashinyan called on his supporters to close all roads, railways and airports.

Pashinyan however insisted that protests must remain completely peaceful.

Update 2 at 17.00 GMT

The Armenian Parliament failed to elect Nikol Pashinyan as prime minister after a long session during which the ruling Republican Parliament declared it will not support his candidature which was supported by all the other factions in the parliament. The vote was 56 against and 45 in favour with one abstension. The vote dissapointed thousands of people who had filled Yerevan's main square since the morning.

The situation increases the deadlock in the current political situation, and street protests are now likely to continue.

Update 1 at 11.00 GMT

Nikol Pahsiyev has been formally nominated for the post of Armenian Prime Minister at a special session of the country's parliament. Pashinyan laid down the main policy directions he proposes to follow. Pashinyan said he was against a system that gave absolute power to the prime minister, and said that the time when one person held all the power in Armenia was over.

Pashinyan gave a long exposition on the country's future foreign policy

He said many are surprised that the new government declares that it will not make major changes in the foreign policy course. "In case of my election to the post of prime minister, Armenia will continue to be a member of the Eurasian Economic Union and CSTO. This position does not come from the taste or changed position of the individual, but from the logic of the popular movement that won in the country.

Pashinyan said that as a result of this movement, the people of Armenia came to power, demanding numerous changes in the internal life of the country. This did not require and does not require changes in the foreign policy course. We as obedient servants of the people are obliged to reckon with this reality.

We considered and consider Russia a strategic ally of Armenia, and this nation-wide movement does not create any threats to the Armenian-Russian cooperation. We attach special importance to Armenia-Georgia and Armenia-Iran relations, and there is no doubt that this movement will give a new impetus to our relations with our neighbors. We will strengthen relations with the EU and the EU member states. We will do our best to liberalize the visa regime with the EU. We look forward to the beginning of negotiations on this issue in the very near future. The speedy ratification and application of the Armenia-EU comprehensive and expanded partnership is based on our relations.

Friendly relations with the United States need a new impetus, and we intend to give new impetus to the development of mutually beneficial Armenian-American cooperation in various fields. We will continue to deepen relations with China, and we consider this to be one of the most important directions of foreign policy, "

At the same time, he stressed that they attach great importance to the holding of the Francophonie summit in the fall and all measures will be taken for its proper conduct.

At the same time, the deputy stressed the commitment to international recognition and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire, because he believes that only by recognizing this fact can new crimes against humanity be prevented. The oppositionist stressed that Armenia will continue its efforts to prevent further crimes against humanity.

Speaking about the Karabakh conflict, Pashinyan said that for them stereotypes in this matter are not important. "We are committed exclusively to a peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, based on the right of self-determination and equality of peoples. We need to give a new impetus to the international recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh. This should become one of the most important areas of the Diaspora's activities, "the opposition leader said.

At the same time, he stated that the most important part of the Armenian demand for this movement is justice and freedom, and their government intends to fully implement both of these requirements.

The session of the National Assembly continues

--------------

The Armenian Parliament is meeting this morning in an effort to elect a new prime minister, after street protests last week resulted in the resignation of Serzh Sargsyan from the post.

The only candidate is Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the protest movement, and a member of parliament from the Yelk Group. Pashinyan is the only candidate that has been formally proposed, and also has the support of two other parliamentary factions, Prosperous Armenia and Armenia Revolutionary Federation. But the majority in the parliament is in the hands of the Republican Party, and whilst initially they indicated they will not hinder the election of Pashinyan, overnight reports suggest they may resort to filibustering tactics to prevent it happening.

Thousands of Pashinyan supporters have filled Yerevan's main square in a festive mood, but the next hours will be decisive both for Pashinyan's prospects, and for Armenia in general.

(This story will be updated throughout the day)

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Nikol Pashinyan (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)