ANAMA hosts 4th International Mine Action Conference in Baku

The 4th International Mine Action Conference is taking place in Baku, Azerbaijan, on 2 - 3 September 2026. The event is hosted by ANAMA, the Azerbaijani Mine action agency and the United Nations.

The conference, which attracts hundreds of particpants from all over the world, opened with a message from president Ilham Aliyev, delivered to the coonference by senior presidential administration official, Hikmet Hajiyev. The theme of the conference is HUMANITARIAN DEMINING FOR URBAN RECOVERY; SETTING STANDARDS OF EXCELLENCE FOR SAFE SETTLEMENTS.

President Aliyev in his message said,

"Unfortunately, mines and unexploded ordnance continue to threaten human life and security in many countries around the world. Long after conflicts have ended, explosive ordnance continues to cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to infrastructure and delay reconstruction projects. In this regard, humanitarian demining is an essential commitment to safe settlements.

Urban reconstruction in post-conflict areas requires the restoration of buildings, roads and public infrastructure, as well as the establishment of security and confidence. No city, village or town can be fully rebuilt, no school or hospital can function safely, no family can return to their homes with dignity, and no economic activity can develop sustainably until the land is cleared of mines and explosive remnants of war. Humanitarian demining is therefore at the heart of urban reconstruction and the creation of safe settlements.

Azerbaijan has faced the most severe manifestation of this challenge. As a result of nearly 30 years of occupation of its territories by Armenia, Azerbaijan has become one of the most mine-contaminated countries in the world. According to preliminary estimates, more than 13 percent of Azerbaijan’s territory is affected by mines and unexploded ordnance. The liberated territories of Karabakh and East Zangezur remain heavily contaminated with mines and unexploded ordnance, which poses serious obstacles to reconstruction, economic activity, safe movement, and the return of former internally displaced persons to their homelands.

Since the end of the Patriotic War in 2020, 437 Azerbaijani citizens, including civilians, servicemen, mine-sweepers, journalists, and those involved in reconstruction work, have been victims of mine and explosive ordnance incidents, resulting in 73 deaths and 364 serious injuries. In total, more than 3,500 of our citizens have been affected by mines since the beginning of Armenia's aggression against Azerbaijan. Among them are children, women, and other civilians, whose lives have been tragically affected by this hidden threat.

The scale of this challenge is further compounded by the fact that the maps of mined areas provided by Armenia are largely inaccurate and incomplete. Mines and booby traps have been found not only in former military positions, but also along roads, near residential areas, in cemeteries, agricultural lands, forests, riverbanks, and other civilian areas. Nevertheless, Azerbaijan is firmly committed to meeting these challenges and ensuring the safe, dignified, and sustainable return of its citizens to their homelands.

Humanitarian demining is an integral and important part of the reconstruction and rehabilitation program in the liberated territories of Azerbaijan. The reconstruction of cities and villages, the restoration of infrastructure, the development of transport and energy networks, the revival of agriculture and the creation of new settlements are carried out in close and precise coordination with demining activities.

Large-scale demining operations are being carried out in the liberated areas. To date, more than 298 thousand hectares of land have been cleared, and 260 thousand 147 mines and unexploded ordnance have been detected and neutralized. Azerbaijan is applying advanced technologies, innovative approaches and modern management systems to increase the speed, safety and efficiency of demining.

Demining activities in Azerbaijan are directly linked to broader national priorities. They support reconstruction, safe return, agricultural revitalization, infrastructure development, environmental protection, social reintegration, and economic recovery. They also contribute to the implementation of “Azerbaijan 2030: National Priorities for Socio-Economic Development,” in particular the priority on the Great Return to the liberated territories.

Cities and villages destroyed during the occupation are being rebuilt within the framework of the Great Return Program, modern infrastructure, roads, tunnels, airports, energy facilities, schools, hospitals, cultural monuments and settlements are being restored. The practical results of this policy are already visible. To date, approximately 40 thousand former internally displaced persons have returned to their homes in the liberated territories. In total, the number of people currently living in Karabakh and East Zangezur has exceeded 90 thousand.

Azerbaijan is developing and implementing advanced models of post-conflict reconstruction, recovery and governance that integrate mine clearance, urban planning, infrastructure development, environmental rehabilitation, digital solutions, social services, public administration and the return of former internally displaced persons into a single coordinated framework. Areas destroyed and depopulated during occupation are quickly transformed into places offering housing, jobs, education and opportunities.

While many challenges remain, the results achieved so far demonstrate the effectiveness of Azerbaijan's integrated approach. We are ready to share this experience with countries and regions facing similar consequences of conflict. Because we believe that the Azerbaijani model of demining, reconstruction and return can be of practical interest to many partners around the world.

Azerbaijan has also taken important initiatives to promote mine action internationally. The importance of safe and sustainable settlements and mine action was at the center of global discussions during the 13th session of the World Urban Forum, which Azerbaijan successfully hosted in Baku.

In addition, our country has declared humanitarian demining as the 18th National Sustainable Development Goal and continues to work to recognize this issue as a global priority.

The mine problem requires stronger international solidarity. Azerbaijan is carrying the main burden of both humanitarian demining and the overall reconstruction and rehabilitation process in liberated areas with its own national resources. However, the scale of the contamination, the urgency of reconstruction, and the humanitarian importance of safe return require broader and more practical support from the international community. Predictable funding, modern equipment, technical knowledge, training, technology transfer, and long-term partnerships are essential to accelerate demining and reduce the hardship caused by mines.

I am confident that this Conference will serve as a valuable platform for open dialogue, exchange of experiences and development of practical cooperation. The discussions held in Baku will contribute to strengthening international mine action standards, promoting innovation, supporting the reconstruction of safe cities, and building safe, resilient and sustainable communities."

 

source: commonspace.eu

 

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
King calls slave trade a 'shameful chapter' during Commonwealth address

King calls slave trade a 'shameful chapter' during Commonwealth address

King Charles has described the transatlantic slave trade as a "shameful chapter of history" that filled him with "profound sorrow" as he opened a summit of Commonwealth leaders in the Caribbean. He said the trade in enslaved persons "still casts a shadow" over the association of nations. There have been calls from some for the UK to make a formal apology for its historic role in the slave trade ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (Chogm) in Antigua and Barbuda, but there was not one in the King's address. Prime Minister Andy Burnham, also at the summit, has said that he is open to Britain issuing a formal apology but has ruled out financial reparations. While there was no direct apology, the King did offer some contrition - and there was also an acknowledgement that he had personally learnt more about the legacy of the slave trade. He said: "The transatlantic trade in enslaved persons still casts a shadow over these islands and other members of our Commonwealth. "As I have said before, that shameful chapter of history is one that fills my heart with horror and my soul with the most profound personal sorrow." (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)