ZARDUSH ALIZADE: "There are people in both Azerbaijan and Armenia who want peace and an end to the Karabakh conflict"

News.Az interviews Azerbaijani political expert Zardusht Alizade.

You have just returned from Georgia, where representatives of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia discussed the prospects for peace in the region. Can you share your impressions of what you heard from the Armenian participants? Do you feel they are ready for a real normalization of relations with Azerbaijan?

There are people in Azerbaijan who want peace, an end to the Karabakh conflict, real democracy, order and the rule of law. This is the same in Armenia. Messrs Hayrikyan, Vanyan and other Armenian participants from the democratic camp who see no benefit for Armenia from the continuation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, wars with its neighbours or the domination of authoritarian rule, but see the benefit in real democracy. And Mr Hayrikyan’s speech concerned the improvement of democratic standards and ensuring the real participation of citizens in governance.

Did you have a chance to talk to the Armenian participants on the sidelines of the conference?


I got to know Mr Hayrikyan closely for the first time. In fact, we first communicated back in 1990 at the General Congress of the USSR, but when I first talked to him closely, I could see that he was more concerned about security, the rights of Armenian citizens and some other issues.

I can say the same about the other Armenian participants who had a good attitude towards Azerbaijan and wished for a speedy resolution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

It is pleasant to hear this. Do you think there many people who share this opinion in Armenia? Do they enjoy any influence in Armenian society?

I don't think there are any more than in Azerbaijan. Propaganda in our societies is monotonous and identical. Eventually, more and more people will understand that it is counterproductive for both nations. But people who think this way are in the minority as yet. No-one authorized members of this minority – either him or me – we were free to come here and participate in this event.

But I'm sure the number of such people will increase.

May such contacts contribute to rapprochement in the positions of Baku and Yerevan on Karabakh?

Those people, those forces in Azerbaijani and Armenian societies who want the conflict to be resolved with respect for both nations, should work together to come up with a solution that would ensure the security of Karabakh Armenians and Azerbaijan's territorial integrity. I think it is the right decision.

Let’s imagine that such a concept has already been developed - how can it be implemented and mutual distrust overcome?


I would like Azerbaijanis and Armenians to develop this idea together. For example, if I put forward such an initiative, the Armenian side will have suspicions about it and say that "Zardusht Alizade is preparing a trap for the Armenians."

If such an initiative were developed by Armenians, Azerbaijanis would think the same way. But if this idea is worked out by a joint group of influential and respected figures, even by politicians, society will take it more seriously.

 

SOURCE: NEWS.AZ

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)