Senior Azerbaijan diplomat accuses Minsk Group co-Chair of monopolizing process. Azimov however said he is against change in the format.

Azerbaijan's outspoken Deputy Foreign Minister, Araz Azimov, has accused the three co-Chair countries of the OSCE Minsk process of monopolizing the process at the expense of the other members of the group, and said that this limits the effectiveness of the group. He however said that Azerbaijan remains committed to the Minsk Process as the mechanism to help resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and does not want to change its composition.

Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov said he is against the replacement of the Minsk Group's format and gave three reasons: "First of all, the leading members of the world community are represented in the Minsk Group. Secondly, the UN Security Council's resolutions of 1993 refer to the Minsk Group. Our positions are based on these resolutions and if the Minsk Group is changed it would weaken these resolutions. And finally, the Minsk Group's format eliminates the participation of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians in the process. Azimov said both the Azerbaijani and the Armenian communities of Nagorno-Karabakh can contribute to the process by voicing their positions, but are not part of the decision making process."

The three co-Chair countries of the Minsk Group are France, Russia and the United States. other members of the Minsk group include Germany, Italy, Finland and Turkey. The Minsk group was constituted in 1992 within the framework of the OSCE and is recognised by the international community as the only format empowered to find a resolution to the Nagorno-Karabkah conflict.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies.

photo: Araz Azimov, the Deputy Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan, (archive picture).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Lebanon's parliament has voted to abolish the death penalty, a move that would make it the first country in the Middle East to formally end capital punishment. A majority of MPs in the 128-seat parliament backed the measure on Tuesday (11 August), while Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc voted against it. The legislation will now go to the cabinet before being passed to President Joseph Aoun for signing. The government has already expressed its support for the measure. Lebanon has not carried out an execution since January 2004, although courts have continued to hand down death sentences. Rights groups estimate that more than 78 people remain on death row. Under the new legislation, capital punishment will be replaced with life imprisonment with hard labour. However, the legislation does not yet set out in detail how the new sentence would be enforced. Hard labour is already written into Lebanese law but has rarely been implemented in recent years. The country's financial crisis and overcrowded prisons have limited the authorities' resources and capacity. The latest legislation follows years of campaigning by civil society groups and lawyers for the removal of capital punishment from Lebanese law. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)