Opinion: "Armenia-Azerbaijan region needs a high-level US envoy" - Azerbaijani Ambassador to the US Elin Suleimanov.

In an article in the Washington publication "The Hill", Azerbaijani Ambassador to the United States, Elin Suleimanov speaks about lessons from the Middle East conflict for Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and the need for a positive vision. The article is reproduced in full:

This week, Elmar Mammadyarov became the first Azerbaijani Foreign Minister to visit Israel and Palestine. This trip, described as "historic" by the Israeli President Shimon Peres, underscored our many shared experiences and concern. My nation also suffered from war just as we were restoring our independence in 1991. Close to a million Azerbaijani civilians lost their homes and became refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) during the war with Armenia, centered on the Nagorno-Karabakh region in Azerbaijan.

We have spared no effort to integrate our refugees and IDPs more broadly into Azerbaijani society, but they long to return home. We have built new homes for them, and we provide extensive social services. These cannot, however, replace the traditional lifestyles and communities that were lost and that they yearn to return to.

Although our lands have been under Armenian occupation for 20 years, we still put our trust in negotiations and international institutions to help bring peace to the region and enable our displaced people to return to their homes. As a member of the United Nations Security Council, Azerbaijan actively contributes to addressing global challenges; in turn, we ask the international community to be more proactive in resolving the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.

During his visit, Minister Mammadyarov shared with the Israeli and Palestinian leaders our hope to see them living in peace and prosperity and enjoying the benefits of peace that they both deserve. This is our aspiration for the South Caucasus as well.

Azerbaijan is a good friend to both the Israelis and the Palestinians. Our society has a long tradition of respect for the Jewish people, and relations between Azerbaijan and Israel are growing stronger. When Azerbaijan declared our independence from the former Soviet Union in October, 1991, Israel recognized our country two months later - one of the first countries to do so. In April, 1992 - 21 years ago - our countries formally established diplomatic ties.

Of course, as a nation with proud a Muslim heritage and an active member of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), we want to see the Palestinian people fully realize their potential and live prosperously.

As the Middle East has shown, the more time that passes with the conflicts unresolved, the more entrenched the sides become. But while Middle East peace is always a front-burner issue, the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict needs more aggressive international engagement. We urge the United States, for instance, to appoint a high-level, authoritative envoy as a mediator.

We hope to see peace in both the Middle East and in our own region. Azerbaijan's rapid economic development and successful regional projects with Georgia and Turkey demonstrate the potential dividends of peace and the opportunities missed as a result of continuing hostility.

In order to successfully resolve the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, the international community needs to move with more urgency. We do not want the major threat this conflict poses to become a chronic challenge and tinderbox for our region.

My generation grew up together with Armenian neighbors and remembers the warm human relations. But today, younger generations in Azerbaijan and Armenia do not share these human ties and do not know their neighbors. With a positive vision for our region's future, we can change that.

source: The Hill and News.az

photo: Azerbaijani Ambassador to the US Elin Suleimanov (Archive picture)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)