Echoes of Afghanistan resonate in the Sahel

The Taliban's victory in Afghanistan risks blowing a wave of hope among jihadists around the world. Islamist groups currently involved in insurgencies across Africa have saluted the Taliban's success.

"God is great," a media outlet linked to Somalia's al-Shabab wrote in response to the takeover.

Elsewhere, while he had not spoken since 2019, the jihadist leader of Jama'a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin' (JNIM), the Sahelian branch of Al-Qaida, paid tribute to "[their] Islamic emirate of Afghanistan, on the occasion of the withdrawal of the invading American forces and their allies", in an audio message before the fall of Kabul on Tuesday (10 August). A reversal which, he added, "is the result of two decades of patience".

It is no coincidence that the irresistible Taliban offensive resonates even in the far reaches of the Sahel. When JNIM was created in 2017, Iyad Ag Ghali pledged allegiance to Al-Qaida, but also to Afghan Islamists. The Taliban, like the Sahel fighters, are part of the same nebula. "They have a real common insurrectional know-how, which is the product of the Al-Qaida matrix," underlines Yvan Guichaoua, researcher at the School of International Studies at the University of Kent in Brussels.  They also share a common goal: the application of Sharia law."

The jihadists were not the only ones in the Sahel to closely follow the tipping of Afghanistan into the Taliban fold. Voices are being raised in the Sahel countries, hoping that lessons of American failure will be learned. Here too, as in Afghanistan, Western interventionism fails to counter the jihadist insurgency.

"US troops cannot and must not fight and die in a war that Afghan forces are not prepared to wage for themselves."

This statement by US president Joe Biden echoes the many reactions of African Internet users who fear such a catastrophic scenario if ever the foreign forces deployed on the continent were to withdraw in a similar fashion.

For the most part, they call for the strengthening of African national armies to avoid such a scenario on the continent.

In the meantime, the current US predicament in Afghanistan does not mean that events will unfold in a similar fashion in the Sahel region, where European countries, notably France, have been engaged actively in the fight against jihadism for almost a decade.

Doctor Sampala Balima, a political scientist from Thomas Sankara University in Burkina Faso, told the BBC that “contexts of emergence of dissent in the Sahel and Afghanistan differ, apart from Islamist ideology. In addition, violent extremism in the Sahel does not concern a single state territory and the armed terrorist groups (GAT) are still today the object of incessant decomposition and recomposition”.

"This is an important dimension or even an advantage to be considered quickly in the structuring of the fight, because the Afghan case can galvanize and even consolidate the strategies in the Sahel. The Afghan case is a particular invitation for the Sahel countries to invent their own response to the security threat, especially when taking into account the insurgency in the peripheries that it secretes”, she added.

Additionally, although parallels have been made between the withdrawal of foreign troops in Afghanistan and France's decision to reduce its military presence in the Sahel, by the JNIM leader for instance, France remains committed to fight jihadism in the region alongside regional armies. Moreover, troops are to be reduced, not withdrawn, as part of a plan to involve more European powers in the region within the new Takuba task force.

 

source: commonspace.eu with BBC (London), Le Monde (Paris), RTS info (Geneva) and agencies.
photo: The EU's Takuba Task Force is expected to replace French troops in the Sahel (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)