Echoes of Afghanistan resonate in the Sahel

The Taliban's victory in Afghanistan risks blowing a wave of hope among jihadists around the world. Islamist groups currently involved in insurgencies across Africa have saluted the Taliban's success.

"God is great," a media outlet linked to Somalia's al-Shabab wrote in response to the takeover.

Elsewhere, while he had not spoken since 2019, the jihadist leader of Jama'a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin' (JNIM), the Sahelian branch of Al-Qaida, paid tribute to "[their] Islamic emirate of Afghanistan, on the occasion of the withdrawal of the invading American forces and their allies", in an audio message before the fall of Kabul on Tuesday (10 August). A reversal which, he added, "is the result of two decades of patience".

It is no coincidence that the irresistible Taliban offensive resonates even in the far reaches of the Sahel. When JNIM was created in 2017, Iyad Ag Ghali pledged allegiance to Al-Qaida, but also to Afghan Islamists. The Taliban, like the Sahel fighters, are part of the same nebula. "They have a real common insurrectional know-how, which is the product of the Al-Qaida matrix," underlines Yvan Guichaoua, researcher at the School of International Studies at the University of Kent in Brussels.  They also share a common goal: the application of Sharia law."

The jihadists were not the only ones in the Sahel to closely follow the tipping of Afghanistan into the Taliban fold. Voices are being raised in the Sahel countries, hoping that lessons of American failure will be learned. Here too, as in Afghanistan, Western interventionism fails to counter the jihadist insurgency.

"US troops cannot and must not fight and die in a war that Afghan forces are not prepared to wage for themselves."

This statement by US president Joe Biden echoes the many reactions of African Internet users who fear such a catastrophic scenario if ever the foreign forces deployed on the continent were to withdraw in a similar fashion.

For the most part, they call for the strengthening of African national armies to avoid such a scenario on the continent.

In the meantime, the current US predicament in Afghanistan does not mean that events will unfold in a similar fashion in the Sahel region, where European countries, notably France, have been engaged actively in the fight against jihadism for almost a decade.

Doctor Sampala Balima, a political scientist from Thomas Sankara University in Burkina Faso, told the BBC that “contexts of emergence of dissent in the Sahel and Afghanistan differ, apart from Islamist ideology. In addition, violent extremism in the Sahel does not concern a single state territory and the armed terrorist groups (GAT) are still today the object of incessant decomposition and recomposition”.

"This is an important dimension or even an advantage to be considered quickly in the structuring of the fight, because the Afghan case can galvanize and even consolidate the strategies in the Sahel. The Afghan case is a particular invitation for the Sahel countries to invent their own response to the security threat, especially when taking into account the insurgency in the peripheries that it secretes”, she added.

Additionally, although parallels have been made between the withdrawal of foreign troops in Afghanistan and France's decision to reduce its military presence in the Sahel, by the JNIM leader for instance, France remains committed to fight jihadism in the region alongside regional armies. Moreover, troops are to be reduced, not withdrawn, as part of a plan to involve more European powers in the region within the new Takuba task force.

 

source: commonspace.eu with BBC (London), Le Monde (Paris), RTS info (Geneva) and agencies.
photo: The EU's Takuba Task Force is expected to replace French troops in the Sahel (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)