Have you ever wondered what the "Minsk Process" was all about, how did it start and what has Minsk got to do with it? Read here the answers to ten questions that you always wanted to ask.

The MINSK PROCESS

(1) What is it?
The OSCE Minsk Process is the mechanism that the international community has designated to try to find a resolution to the conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis on Nagorno-Karabakh and other issues.
The process was launched in embryonic form in 1992 in the framework of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, but became more formal when that institution became an organization (OSCE) in 1994.


(2) Why is it called the Minsk Process?
The original idea was to prepare the sides in the conflict to participate in an international conference in Minsk. The conference never took place, and the process has no relationship with Minsk whatsoever, but it continues using this name because the sides could not agree on a new name for it.


(3) Who is in charge of the Minsk Process
Formally it is the OSCE and more specifically a group of member states of the OSCE that were originally designated to organize the Minsk Conference, but in fact it is the three countries that co-Chair the group, France, Russia and the United States who are in charge. Other members of the group and other OSCE member states sometimes complain that they are not even informed of what is going on.


(4) Who are the people involved?
The three co-chair countries are represented by diplomats, usually Ambassadors or diplomats of similar rank. The three current co-Chair are Ambassadors Igor Popov (Russia), Jacques Faure (France) and Ian Kelly (USA).


(5) And who does the day to day work?
For a long time the continuity of the process has been kept by Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk who every year is appointed as the special representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office. He is assisted by a small team of field officers based in the region.


(6) France is one of the co-chair countries. Does that mean the European Union is represented?
No France is a co-Chair in her own right and does not represent the EU. At its pleasure it sometimes keeps the EU informed of developments in the process.


(7) What are the Madrid Principles?
The Madrid Principles are a set of ideas based on the 1975 Helsinki Final Act which were presented to Armenia and Azerbaijan by the Minsk Group co-Chair during the OSCE Meeting in Madrid in 2007. The principles have since been fine-tuned in line with discussions held with the sides. They aim to provide the sides with a framework within which they can then start negotiating a peace agreement. They provide for a phasedArmenian withdrawal from Azerbaijani territory around Nagorno-Karabakh which they occupied during the conflict, opening up of communications, demining and demilitarization, after which it is envisaged to deploy a peacekeeping force and the granting of an interim status to the territory. They also envisage a legally binding public expression of will to determine the future status of Nagorno-Karabakh. In their generic format the Madrid Principles have been accepted by the sides, "with some reservations". However once the sides started asking for details and clarifications it became clear that the distance between them was still substantial.


(8) What are the biggest achievements of the Minsk Group?
Individual diplomats representing the three co-chair countries have often said that the fact that no new conflict has taken place between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the last two decades is thanks to the efforts of the Minsk Process. There were times when the Group expressed optimism that a solution was round the corner, but it never happened. The Group has managed to keep the sides talking, even in times of tension, but in the last two years even that has become difficult.

(9) What are the biggest criticisms of the Minsk Group?
They are sometimes criticized for not having delivered. But to say this is unfair since it hardly depended on them. However the way the process has been managed, the way the sides were allowed to engage with it, and the secrecy surrounding every step of the negotiations are sometimes mentioned as things that could have been done differently.


( 10) Is there a chance that the work of the OSCE Minsk Group will ever succeed?
There are different views on this. Officially most diplomats and politicians will tell you that it is the best mechanism available and the sides have to make it work. In private some are saying now that the process has ran out of steam. For the moment everybody seems to be happy to leave it in the laps of France, Russia and the United States. But for how long?

This Q and A was compiled by the staff of Commonspaceextra, based on publicly available material.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.