A fragile peace between national minorities in Georgia is under threat

With fighting between Armenians and Azerbaijanis raging in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, a relative peace and "business as usual" atmosphere between different national minorities in Georgia is now under serious pressure.

The current crisis is likely to affect the large Armenian and Azerbaijani communities, which have been living until now side by side in relative peace and stability.

Georgia is the most ethnically diverse state in the South Caucasus and Azerbaijanis and Armenians form the largest group of ethnic minorities, together making up more than 500,000 citizens of Georgia. 

The Azerbaijani community numbers 284,761 persons, according to the "National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Assessment Survey Report 2007-2008". Azerbaijanis are the country's largest ethnic minority group, inhabiting mostly rural areas in Kvemo Kartli, Kakheti, Shida Kartli and Mtskheta-Mtianeti, and they have around 117 Azerbaijani-language schools. 

On the other hand there are nearly 248,929 Armenians in Georgia, again according to the "National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Assessment Survey Report 2007-2008", living mostly in Samtskhe-Javakheti region and in Tbilisi, with 141 Armenian-language schools.

Both communities play an active role in the Georgian economy. They are mainly engaged through small or a medium-sized businesses, mainly in the services sector, agriculture and trade.

They also traditionally take an active part in the political life of the country, especially during the parliamentary elections, where minorities traditionally vote for the ruling party in Georgia. 

But with the war in Karabakh a relative peace and "business as usual" with these communities could change and this could affect Georgia especially in these challenging moments, with upcoming parliamentary elections, and a spike in the number of covid-19 cases that are now the highest since the outbreak of the pandemic which has also taken a heavy toll on the economy. 

Georgia traditionally has good relations with both Azerbaijan and Armenia, both economically and politically. The life of all three republics has always depended to one degree or another on the stability and well-being of each other and co-existing of this communities in Georgia has always been the proof of the possibility of peace between their home-countries. 

Until now, there have been no major incidents between these communities, and it seems that the Georgian authorities are keen to keep it that way and dealing with the issue with a high degree of sensitivity. 

On Monday, however, we saw the first sign of tension. A small incident developed when humanitarian aid from the Armenian-speaking community of Samtskhe-Javakheti was stopped by Georgian border guards on the Georgia-Armenian border. A group of Georgian-Armenians were also not allowed to cross the border, since they were suspected of going to join the war effort.

The incident appears to have been defused, but it was just a sign of what can happen in the future. The Georgian government appears to be seriously worried about the situation, and has offered to host talks between the Armenian and Azerbaijani governments in Tbilisi. However as long as the fighting continues, the stress on Georgia's delicate inter-ethnic relations will also continued.

related content: Commentary: The high cost in human life of the current fighting in Karabakh

Source: This report was prepared by the Commonspace.eu South Caucasus Bureau in Tbilisi

Photo: A stand-off at the Georgian-Armenian border on 29 September 2020 (picture courtesy of JNews.ge, Tbilisi

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: Ukraine’s long-term prosperity, security and defence We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. Peace and stability in the Middle East We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: Ukraine’s long-term prosperity, security and defence We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. Peace and stability in the Middle East We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)