EU tariffs on China are not punishment, says German economy minister

Proposed European Union tariffs on Chinese goods are not a "punishment", German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action Robert Habeck assured Chinese officials in Beijing on Saturday (22 June). The visit is the first by a senior European official since Brussels proposed significant tariffs on imports of Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) in response to what the EU sees as excessive subsidies. Ahead of Habeck's arrival, China warned that rising tensions over EVs could spark a trade war. "It is important to understand that these are not punitive tariffs," Habeck told the opening session of a dialogue on climate and transformation. He stressed that unlike the US, Brazil and Turkey, which have used punitive tariffs, the EU is taking a different approach.

The European Commission spent nine months investigating whether Chinese companies had received unfair subsidies. Habeck explained that any countervailing duties resulting from the EU's review are not punitive but are intended to offset the advantages that Beijing has granted to Chinese companies. "Achieving common, equal standards for market access is essential," he added. During a meeting with Zheng Shanjie, chairman of China's National Development and Reform Commission, Habeck explained that the proposed EU tariffs aimed to create a level playing field. Zheng countered, "We will do everything to protect Chinese companies," arguing that the tariffs would hurt both sides. He urged Germany to take the lead within the EU and "do the right thing". Zheng rejected accusations of unfair subsidies, arguing that the growth of China's new energy industry was due to competitive advantages in technology, market and industry chains. This growth was the result of competition, not subsidies, Zheng said. Following his meeting with Zheng, Habeck spoke with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who was due to discuss the tariffs with EU Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis via video conference on Saturday evening.

Although trade tensions were a key issue, the main aim of the meeting was to strengthen cooperation on the green transition between the two industrialised nations. This was the first plenary meeting of the Climate and Transformation Dialogue since Germany and China signed a memorandum of understanding in June last year to cooperate on climate change and the green transition. China will add nearly 350 gigawatts (GW) of new renewable capacity in 2023, more than half the global total. At this rate, China is likely to exceed its 2030 target this year, according to a June report by the International Energy Agency (IEA). While Habeck praised China's expansion of renewable energy, he stressed the importance of looking at overall CO2 emissions. Coal will still account for almost 60% of China's electricity supply 2023. "China has a coal-based energy mix," Zheng acknowledged, with China, India and Indonesia accounting for nearly 75% of global coal consumption, prioritising energy security, availability and cost over carbon emissions. Zheng noted that China is building coal-fired power plants as a security measure. "I still believe that the massive expansion of coal power can be approached differently if you consider the role of renewables in the system," Habeck replied.

Source: commonspace.eu and Reuters with other agencies

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
 UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

Applause rang out in the UN General Assembly Hall on Friday as countries endorsed a declaration on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and implementation of the two-State solution with Israel.  The New York Declaration is the outcome of an international conference held in July at UN Headquarters, organized by France and Saudi Arabia, which resumes later this month. The General Assembly comprises all 193 UN Member States and 142 countries voted in favour of a resolution backing the document. Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained. The vote highlights the current Israeli international isolation as a result of its current policies. Prior to the vote, French Ambassador Jérôme Bonnafont recalled that the New York Declaration “lays out a single roadmap to deliver the two-State solution”. This involves an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, release of all hostages held there, and the establishment of a Palestinian State that is both viable and sovereign. The roadmap further calls for the disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from governance in Gaza, normalization between Israel and the Arab countries, as well as collective security guarantees.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
 UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

Applause rang out in the UN General Assembly Hall on Friday as countries endorsed a declaration on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and implementation of the two-State solution with Israel.  The New York Declaration is the outcome of an international conference held in July at UN Headquarters, organized by France and Saudi Arabia, which resumes later this month. The General Assembly comprises all 193 UN Member States and 142 countries voted in favour of a resolution backing the document. Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained. The vote highlights the current Israeli international isolation as a result of its current policies. Prior to the vote, French Ambassador Jérôme Bonnafont recalled that the New York Declaration “lays out a single roadmap to deliver the two-State solution”. This involves an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, release of all hostages held there, and the establishment of a Palestinian State that is both viable and sovereign. The roadmap further calls for the disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from governance in Gaza, normalization between Israel and the Arab countries, as well as collective security guarantees.