Azerbaijan threatens to expel Red Cross. Deputy PM Hassanov criticised the failure of the ICRC to meet two Azerbaijanis captured by Armenians.

Azerbaijan has threathened to expel the representation of the International Committee of the Red Cross from the country unless the international body gets access to two Azerbaijanis who have been captured by Armenian forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone in the last days

Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the State Committee for Work with Refugees and IDPs, Ali Hasanov said that he has given a warning to this effect to the Head of the ICRC Delegation in Baku.  According to the Azerbaijani News Agency, APA, "Hasanov noted that the failure to arrange a meeting with those who have been taken hostages in Kalbajar region after a week casts some doubt on the activity of ICRC".

The news agency further quoted the Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister as saying, "Which Armenian hostage has been tortured in Azerbaijani? Why does ICRC immediately apply to Azerbaijani side for meeting when any Armenian is taken hostage? Why Armenian side does not act so? Therefore, I seriously warned the ICRC Azerbaijani representation that if we do not achieve it, serious measures will be taken toward the ICRC representation, even up to banishing from the country... They should take necessary measures".

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "such a public rebuke of the Red Cross is very rare, not only in the Caucasus, but world-wide. The ICRC is one of the world's most respected international organisations and its work is valued by governments world-wide. The ICRC works through quiet diplomacy across the conflict divide in many situations and in its history over decades has helped millions of prisoners. This is not the first time that it has been caught in controversy because by its very nature its work is complex and often controversial. However this position of the Azerbaijani government has taken many in the international community by surprise. Access to prisoners depends on the country or authority holding the prisoner, and the Red Cross can do very little if such access is not immediately forthcoming. It has, in some situations, taken the ICRC months to get access to prisoners in some conflict situations. The ICRC is one of the few international organisations that works across the conflict divide in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, including in Nagorno-Karabakh. Its expulsion from Azerbaijan would therefore be a serious blow to international engagement with the process."

For more on the incidents in Kalbajar read:

Armenia says it will not treat captives as prisoners of war.

Kasprzyk in Stepanaker as mystery of "Azerbaijani terrorists" deepens.

source: commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)