Mubariz Ahmadoglu accuses the US of wanting to put the resolution of the Karabakh problem on the back burner, according to "Zerkalo".

The respected Azerbaijani political analyst, Mubariz Ahmadoglu, Director of the Centre for Political Technologies,  slammed US policy towards the South Caucasus in a press conference held at Trend News Agency on 6 January 2012.

Reflecting an opinion that is being increasingly voiced by Azerbaijani political analysts Ahmadoglu said that US policy towards the region was completely controlled by the Armenian lobby, citing the recent failure of the US congress to confirm the appointment of Mathew Bryza as Ambassador in Baku.

The Azerbaijani Russian language newspaper Zerkalo, in its edition on 7 January 2012 quoted Ahmadoglu as saying that "America wanted us to put the resolution of the Karabakh conflict on back burner and deal seriously with the division of the Caspian Sea, and they created there problems for themselves. Washington also wanted to clash Azerbaijan with Russia. But the US did nothing to help Georgia when the country conflicted with Russia. Naturally, Baku understood it, saw the role of Armenians in the developments and did not go to a confrontation with its northern neighbour with whom we have no fundamental disagreements,"

Speaking on the Karabakh situation Ahmadoglu said that the political resources for the resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict have been exhausted. "Despite the fact that great efforts were attached, the meeting of the presidents of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia in Kazan did not produce significant results. And because of the fact that the organizers of the meeting made changes to the agreed text of the document, it was not signed," Zerkalo quoted the expert as saying. In his view, the collapse of the OSCE Minsk Group's mediation has already begun. According to the newspaper the political scientist added that the attempts to arrange a meeting and dialogue between the Azerbaijani and Armenian communities of Nagornyy Karabakh remained fruitless. According to him, it was because the Armenians are not agreeing to this dialogue, and generally they do not accept the division of communities of Nagorno Karabakh into Armenian and Azerbaijani ones.

source: commonspace.eu with Trend and Zerkalo

photo: Mubariz Ahmedoglu (picture courtesy of Trend)

"The public opinion in Armenia on the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict is more and more inclined towards the direction of the surrender, there matures a subconscious feeling in society that they failed to 'privatize' Nagorno Karabakh," says Ahmadoglu.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.
Editor's choice
News
Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students in Tbilisi have participated in the campaign LANDMINE FREE SOUTH CAUCASUS 2026. The regional’ Landmine Free South Caucasus’ (LFSC) campaign was initiated by LINKS Europe Foundation in 2018 to address the critical issue of landmine and unexploded ordnance contamination in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. With significant landmine contamination in the region posing an ongoing threat to life and eliciting high economic costs, LFSC advocated for a regional, holistic approach to complete clearance.  Future Doctors Join the Conversation on Friday, 16 October in Tbilisi. "As part of the Landmine Free South Caucasus 2026 campaign, an informative and interactive meeting was held in Tbilisi with medical students. The session was conducted by George Simonishvili, South Caucasus Co-ordinator for LINKS Europe.  The meeting focused on the humanitarian consequences of landmines and other explosive remnants of war in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, with particular attention to the Red Bridge minefield near the borders of the three countries, and emphasised that these dangers remain a current humanitarian challenge. It also underlined that future medical professionals will encounter the long-term effects of explosion injuries and can play a role in awareness and prevention.  Students actively engaged throughout the discussion, showing strong interest in the humanitarian impact and the need for cooperation. Under the slogan "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," the event encouraged students to support public awareness, solidarity with survivors, and a safer South Caucasus free from landmine threats.  The event was organised by LINKS Europe as part of LFSC26.  "Medical Students Stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," "Future Doctors, Safer Futures: Together Against Landmines." "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus".

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)