Monday Commentary: The 21st century is Asia’s moment, but for many Asian countries this moment is full of perils

China wants to be first in the world, but its first stop is Asia. While the rest of the world debates and sometimes agonises over whether and how to engage with China, Asian countries have no choice but to engage. And in most cases, they will have to do so on China's terms. Most countries have to play a balancing game, but China is taking no chances. Chinese leader Xi Jinping's recent trip to Southeast Asia in April was a case in point. Another was the China-GCC-ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur on 28 May, attended by Chinese Premier Li Qiang and the leaders of the six Gulf monarchies and the ten ASEAN countries.

China-GCC-Asian

Those attending the Kuala Lumpur summit pledged to foster closer cooperation with a strong emphasis on economic integration and energy. The influential South China Morning Post described the summit as “marking a milestone in enhancing tripartite alignment to tackle regional and global challenges”.

In a 4200-word joint statement, which observers described as “comprehensive” the representatives of  China, GCC and ASEAN countries reaffirmed their commitment to a rules-based multilateral trading system and economic globalisation. Malaysia currently holds the rotating chair of ASEAN, which also includes Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. The GCC comprises the six Gulf monarchies: Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

In case there was any doubt, the joint statement recognised China’s “critical role in promoting regional and global peace, stability, prosperity and sustainable development”. The statement outlined a broad framework for trilateral cooperation, in line with China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its policy to expand global economic ties.

Communist China and the six hereditary monarchies of the Gulf

One would have thought that China, with its Communist system, the all-pervasive role of the Chinese Communist Party, and the six Gulf hereditary monarchies with their archaic governance and free market economics, were not an easy fit. But China stopped trying to export communism a long time ago, and the two sides have found enough areas of cooperation and mutual benefit, to become bosom friends.

It is worth remembering that the GCC supplies over a third of China’s crude oil imports

US President Donald Trump last month paid a high-profile visit to Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar. Big deals were announced, many in the field of defence and security. The GCC mantra in recent years has been based on having the US as the main partner for security, and China as the main partner for trade and economics. Some unkind people have paraphrased this as being with the US for the serious stuff, and with China for everything else. In real life, things cannot be divided so neatly. AI and high tech are areas where the US and China are competing aggressively. Sooner or later, the Gulf Monarchies will have to choose. But for the moment they are happy to say to Trump what he wants to hear, and to sign up for a Chinese-inspired statement in Kuala Lumpur.

Still, China takes no chances, and it wants to show to the Gulf Monarchies that it is a more reliable partner at the international level. The  Kuala Lumpur statement highlighted support for the Arab position on Gaza and for a two-state solution for resolving the wider Palestinian problem. China is still basking in the glory of the deal it brokered in 2023 which saw Iran and Saudi Arabia normalising relations.

For China, the Asian space is crucial

If good relations with the GCC countries are a Chinese priority, relations with the geographically closer ASEAN countries are vital. This is not easy for China primarily because of Chinese claims, and increasingly Chinese actions, in the South China Sea. This brings China into direct confrontation with Asean. The Kuala Lumpur statement did not mention the issue at all. But within days the Chinese were flexing their muscles in the Spratley Islands. The Chinese military on Saturday (31 May) launched a sea and air combat readiness patrol around the Scarborough Shoal. According to an official statement issued in Beijing China wanted “to further strengthen its control and defend its sovereignty”.

Vietnam

It is no coincidence that President XI Jinping visited Vietnam during his trip to Southeast Asia in April. Vietnam, like China, has a Communist government, and there were changes in the top leadership of the Vietnamese Communist Party recently. Yet in both countries, the nationalist agenda dominates both the discourse and the actions of the Communist leadership. The two countries fought a war in 1979. In this century Vietnam has developed relations with the US as a counterweight to China. However, China and Vietnam are keen to manage relations to avoid another conflict.

Philippines and the South China Sea

The situation is much more difficult for China when it comes to the Philippines. Chinese ambitions in the South China Sea are being rejected and challenged openly by the government in Manila, led by President Marcos Jr, who has restored the historic relationship between the US and the Philippines.

On Sunday (1 June)  the Philippines defence minister Teodoro told the BBC that China has been "absolutely irresponsible and reckless in appropriating most, if not all, of the South China Sea and the world cannot tolerate this."

The Philippines has often complained of aggressive and violent tactics by the Chinese coast guard. The Defence Minister echoed the call for the preservation of the international order, saying that "the takeaway of a lot of defence ministers is that Europe and the US must continue to lead" on this.

EU pushback; Macron in Singapore

Is Europe interested in leading in Asia? In theory yes. The new defence policy sees Europe as a global power. In practice, only two European countries are active Asian players: France and the UK. French President, Emanuel Macron was in Asia in the last days,  making the keynote speech at the opening of the Shangri-La Security Forum in Singapore. Usually, the Chinese are central at the Forum, seen also as a good place for Sino-American contacts, especially on defence. Last year the Defence Minister led the Chinese delegation. This year the Chinese presence was low-key, made up of people from the military academies.

That did not stop Macron from setting up his stall. He called for the building of a “new special relationship” between the European Union and Asian countries in the Indo-Pacific region. Macron stressed the need for “new coalitions” between “mid-size countries”. The French president said Asia and Europe have a common interest in preventing the disintegration of the global order.

"The time for non-alignment has undoubtedly passed, but the time for coalitions of action has come and requires that countries capable of acting together give themselves every means to do so," Macron said.

Macron is following leaders of China, Japan and other European countries in visiting the region in recent weeks, in a sign of Southeast Asia's strategic importance amid uncertainties on global supply chains and trade.

Image
President
French President Emmanuel Macron delivers the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on 30 May 2025. ©France 24

In his keynote address to the Shangri-La security forum, Macron urged China to stop North Korea (DPRK) from sending forces to help Russia's war in Ukraine if it wanted to avoid NATO expanding its role in Asia. "If China doesn't want NATO being involved in Southeast Asia or in Asia, they should prevent DPRK from being engaged on European soil," France’s News 24 news channel quoted Macron as saying.

Taiwan

Of course, the elephant in the room is Taiwan, which China considers as its errant province. China insists that a military move to bring Taiwan back to the Chinese fold is an option. If China moves militarily against Taiwan, the rest of the world will have to act. That is the moment Western leaders dread, but one they must prepare for.

India and Japan

In the end, the breaks on China in Asia will not be the US or Europe. It will be two Asian powers, India and Japan, that China will have to take into account. India-China and Japan-China relations are complex and multifaceted. Slowly but surely both India and Japan are preparing for the moment they have to stand up to China.

Asia’s moment is full of perils for Asian countries

The 21st century is often described as Asia’s moment. Certainly, the continent is the new economic powerhouse. Its military strength is also increasing. Yet this moment is also full of perils to the Asian countries, who must tread with caution.

Please click here to download this week's Monday Commentary.

Source: Dr Dennis Sammut is the Director of LINKS Europe and Managing Editor of commonspace.eu. 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners.

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)