Mayday "struggle" in Tbilisi put police tactics on the spot. Sharp reaction by Georgian civil society after police break up Mayday rally organised by "Laboratory 1918".

There was a sharp reaction from Georgian civil society organisations yesterday after police broke up a May Day demonstration on Tbilisi's Rustaveli Avenue. The protest was organised by the Georgian grassroot movement Laboratory 1918 to highlight problems of poverty and youth unemployment in Georgian society. Several people were arrested but were released after a few hours. The incident has once more put the limelight on Georgian police tactics.

Commonspace.eu interviewed some of the co-ordinators of yesterday's march. They said that a peaceful demonstration had proceeded peacefully and without incident from the area around Aghmashenbeli Avenue towards the centre of the capital, Rustaveli Avenue. Once the demonstration which numbered several hundred people reached Rustaveli Avenue the police became very aggressive and scuffles erupted, during which several dozen demonstrators were arrested. The organisers say that amongst the policemen who broke down the demonstration were several who were not in uniform.

Several Georgian NGOs have demanded an investigation into why a peaceful demonstration was broken up by force. A spokesperson for the Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs said that police intervened after demonstrators ignored repeated warnings not to block the traffic. A police source also said that demonstrators were "violating public order".

Laboratory 1918 is a Georgian grassroot organisation that emerged from amongst students of Tbilisi State University in 2011 mainly to demand reforms in the education sector and and to question decisions by the University administration. In 2012 the Movement was on the vanguard of huge public protests in Tbilisi following the prisoners abuse scandal. The Movement claims to be a broadly based left wing organisation with a strong social message and independent from any political party.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "the incident is important not because of the size or nature of the demonstration but because it is an indication of the new higher standards that the Georgian public and particularly civil society activists are demanding from the new Government of Bidhzina Ivanishvili. Many activists are determined not to allow the new government to slide into the bad habits of its predecessor, which had a bad track record of dealing with any form of dissent. Therefore even incidents that in the greater scheme of things are small are now taken very seriously. This is a very healthy and positive development, and this attitude needs to be maintained if Georgia's fragile democracy is to succeed. It was interesting that Laboratory 1918 activists who were arrested in the incident rebuffed expressions of solidarity from the former ruling party of President Saakashvili, the United National Movement. The group is determined to stick up for its rights but is not ready to allow itself to be manipulated by political forces which it still considers to be undemocratic. This is a clear sign that georgian civil society is determined to remain on the vanguard of protecting Georgian democracy."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: protestors at yesterday's Mayday rally organised by Laboratory 1918  - picture courtesy of the Facebook page Lab1918 (official).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
ANAMA hosts 4th International Mine Action Conference in Baku

ANAMA hosts 4th International Mine Action Conference in Baku

The 4th International Mine Action Conference is taking place in Baku, Azerbaijan, on 2 - 3 September 2026. The event is hosted by ANAMA, the Azerbaijani Mine action agency and the United Nations. The conference, which attracts hundreds of particpants from all over the world, opened with a message from president Ilham Aliyev, delivered to the coonference by senior presidential administration official, Hikmet Hajiyev. The theme of the conference is HUMANITARIAN DEMINING FOR URBAN RECOVERY; SETTING STANDARDS OF EXCELLENCE FOR SAFE SETTLEMENTS. President Aliyev in his message said, "Unfortunately, mines and unexploded ordnance continue to threaten human life and security in many countries around the world. Long after conflicts have ended, explosive ordnance continues to cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to infrastructure and delay reconstruction projects. In this regard, humanitarian demining is an essential commitment to safe settlements. Urban reconstruction in post-conflict areas requires the restoration of buildings, roads and public infrastructure, as well as the establishment of security and confidence. No city, village or town can be fully rebuilt, no school or hospital can function safely, no family can return to their homes with dignity, and no economic activity can develop sustainably until the land is cleared of mines and explosive remnants of war. Humanitarian demining is therefore at the heart of urban reconstruction and the creation of safe settlements. (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)