Mayday "struggle" in Tbilisi put police tactics on the spot. Sharp reaction by Georgian civil society after police break up Mayday rally organised by "Laboratory 1918".

There was a sharp reaction from Georgian civil society organisations yesterday after police broke up a May Day demonstration on Tbilisi's Rustaveli Avenue. The protest was organised by the Georgian grassroot movement Laboratory 1918 to highlight problems of poverty and youth unemployment in Georgian society. Several people were arrested but were released after a few hours. The incident has once more put the limelight on Georgian police tactics.

Commonspace.eu interviewed some of the co-ordinators of yesterday's march. They said that a peaceful demonstration had proceeded peacefully and without incident from the area around Aghmashenbeli Avenue towards the centre of the capital, Rustaveli Avenue. Once the demonstration which numbered several hundred people reached Rustaveli Avenue the police became very aggressive and scuffles erupted, during which several dozen demonstrators were arrested. The organisers say that amongst the policemen who broke down the demonstration were several who were not in uniform.

Several Georgian NGOs have demanded an investigation into why a peaceful demonstration was broken up by force. A spokesperson for the Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs said that police intervened after demonstrators ignored repeated warnings not to block the traffic. A police source also said that demonstrators were "violating public order".

Laboratory 1918 is a Georgian grassroot organisation that emerged from amongst students of Tbilisi State University in 2011 mainly to demand reforms in the education sector and and to question decisions by the University administration. In 2012 the Movement was on the vanguard of huge public protests in Tbilisi following the prisoners abuse scandal. The Movement claims to be a broadly based left wing organisation with a strong social message and independent from any political party.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "the incident is important not because of the size or nature of the demonstration but because it is an indication of the new higher standards that the Georgian public and particularly civil society activists are demanding from the new Government of Bidhzina Ivanishvili. Many activists are determined not to allow the new government to slide into the bad habits of its predecessor, which had a bad track record of dealing with any form of dissent. Therefore even incidents that in the greater scheme of things are small are now taken very seriously. This is a very healthy and positive development, and this attitude needs to be maintained if Georgia's fragile democracy is to succeed. It was interesting that Laboratory 1918 activists who were arrested in the incident rebuffed expressions of solidarity from the former ruling party of President Saakashvili, the United National Movement. The group is determined to stick up for its rights but is not ready to allow itself to be manipulated by political forces which it still considers to be undemocratic. This is a clear sign that georgian civil society is determined to remain on the vanguard of protecting Georgian democracy."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: protestors at yesterday's Mayday rally organised by Laboratory 1918  - picture courtesy of the Facebook page Lab1918 (official).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)