Armenia is not an icon

Over the last years, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, has taken to challenging a lot of the certainties and taboos that have characterised Armenian society for centuries, and that have also come to define the modern Armenian state, established after the collapse of the USSR in 1990. Pashinyan’s argument is that many of these certainties, which people have been asked to accept without questions, in fact, were used by an elite part of society to keep control over the rest. Pashinyan’s recent exchanges with the Armenian Apostolic Church, were in this vein, but there have been a number of similar “sacred cows” – from the Army to different episodes of history.

This week, the Armenian leader addressed the whole issue of how the state should be perceived. Armenia should not be perceived as an icon in front of which one lights a candle, but as a “living organism” that has its own positives and negatives and “can be loved in some places, and be unattractive in others”, he said. Pashinyan was speaking at a meeting with participants in the “iGorts” program to attract diaspora specialists to government bodies of Armenia. According to him, as quoted by the

media, a living organism can learn, improve and become better, but an icon is what it is.

“It’s in our nature to deify everything. We deify the state, too. The problem is that we are depriving ourselves of the opportunity to make our state better. We deprive ourselves of the vision that the state is an instrument for improving people's lives. We deified our army, and what did we achieve? What we saw in 2020 and after that happened because of the deification of our army. They said: be quiet, you can’t say anything bad, the army is a different organism, you can’t say anything bad about it. But at the same time, we all knew what was happening inside…” Pashinyan said.

The Prime Minister of Armenia also expressed doubt that there are 10 million Armenians living in the world: “I recently asked myself a question: they constantly write about 10 million Armenians, but is there a list of these Armenians somewhere? I'm sure not."

“This is a phenomenon of deification, this number is sacred, do not touch it. This number does not increase or decrease and cannot be changed. If someone says that this is not 10 million, but 10 million 561 thousand, everyone will attack and say: ignoramus, amateur, how do you know? If someone says: no, this is nine million two hundred thousand, they will tell him: “You belittle the global influence of the Armenians, you destroyed 800,000 Armenians with one stroke of the pen.” This is our reality,” said the Armenian leader.

Pashinyan is often accused of being naïve, inexperienced and lacking sophistication. Even his friends and allies often feel embarrassed by some of the things that he says. But in fact what Pashinyan is doing is clearing a lot of old webs as part of an effort to establishing a new Armenia. Most Armenian people appear to be amused rather than shocked with Pashinyan’s statements. They also reflect on what he is saying and tend to agree. Which is why issues such last month’s skirmish with the Armenian Apostolic Church, appear to have strengthened Pashinyan, rather than weakened him. Whatever it is, Pashinyan is engaged in a big conversation with the Armenian people, where there are no taboos anymore, and everything is up for discussion. It remains a big gamble for Pashinyan. But for the moment, he appears to have the pulse of the Armenian people much more than his opponents.

Source: This article was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu. It was first published in the 20 June 2024 issue of the fortnightly digital newsletter, Caucasus Concise.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)