Senior Azerbaijani official lashes out at critics at London conference.

The Deputy Head of the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration, Novruz Mammedov,  was one of the keynote speakers at a conference organised at the Royal United Services Institute in London (RUSI) on Thursday, 4 July on "Shaping the Policy Agenda: British-Azerbaijani Relations in the context of Europe". Another keynote speaker was the British Minister for Europe, David Lidington. The conference was jointly organised by RUSI and the Strategic Studies Centre of Azerbaijan.

In his speech to the conference Novruz Mammedov criticised the west's attitude towards Azerbaijan, saying that it was hard to accept it as fair and well thought through. Mammedov gave a detailed exposition of Azerbaijan's achievements over the last twenty years, and addressed directly criticism being levelled at Azerbaijan over its democracy and human rights record.

According to the Azerbaijani web portal news.az,  in reference to a recent resolution of the European Parliament on Azerbaijan Mammedov said:

As for the reports of some organizations and governmental institutions alleging the violation of democracy and human rights in Azerbaijan, he noted that nothing is being said about the violation of all rights of more, that one million of refugees and IDPs. "Human rights and democracy are kept simply in the context of authorities and opposition", he said, "But, what about the rights of refugees and IDPs or do they not deserve the protection? The position voted in the European Parliament with the participation of 15-20 members is presented as the resolution of the Parliament with total number of 754 members" N.Mammadov continued that as a result, the right of absolute majority of members of the European Parliament is misused. "This contradicts the principles of democracy."

Mammedov also lashed out at criticism in the British media on Azerbaijan. According to news.az he stated that,

"The statistics show that the number of critical reports about Azerbaijan appeared in the British press within 3 months in relation to the criminal actions of two young Azerbaijanis that present themselves as bloggers is more than the general number of articles written about the Karabakh problem in last 20 years".

Speaking about European multiculturalism, Mammadov said that it has already started to decline. "However, Azerbaijan lives in the conditions of peace and tolerance of various religions", he said, "Azerbaijan has managed to build an ideal and tolerant society which can be exemplary for all world countries and even for Europe. This has been declared by the Pope John Paul II during his visit to Baku".

According to Mammadov, taking into account all these facts which should be taken into consideration - it is hard to accept the attitude of West to Azerbaijan as a fair, well thought and substantiated position from political, economic, cultural, religious, geopolitical and other points of view.

Mammadov stressed that choosing the path of close co-operation and integration with Europe since the first years of its independence, Azerbaijan has managed to implement large projects of strategic importance and become the political, economic, cultural, energy and transportation bridge between East and West by addressing all challenges and facing firmly strong pressure.

Mammedov concluded,

"However, we are aware, that as with all countries, Azerbaijan has some minor problems. We take it as normal to be criticized. Nevertheless, we think that the criticism should not be biased and unfair. A selective approach should not be applied to nations. Only a fair criticism can serve the co-operation and allow us to overcome various threats and challenges".  

source: commonspce.eu with news.az

photo: Novruz Mammedov addressing a conference at RUSI in London on 4 July 2013. Also in the picture on the left is the Minister for Europe, David Lidington (picture courtesy of the Centre for Strategic Studies -SAM, Baku.)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)