With Putin back at the helm, and fresh from visits to France and Germany, the stage is set for an important EU-Russia summit in St Petersburg.

On the 3rd and 4th of June, the Konstantinovsky Palace in the St Petersburg suburb of Strel'na will host the 29th EU-Russia Summit, the first high-level contact between EU leaders and Russian President Vladimir Putin since the latter's inauguration for a third term in early May, and one which it is hoped will set the tone for cooperation over the next six years. Heading the EU delegation will be Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council, and Jose Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission. As a precursor to the summit, President Putin is visiting Germany and France for bilateral discussions with two of Russia's most important European partners, covering many of the same issues likely to arise in St Petersburg, including energy supplies and the political situation in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Meanwhile, in Brussels, Russian and EU officials have held a "brainstorming" session on a new partnership agreement - something which has been under negotiation for some years, but which has been suffering from "stagnation", according to Vladimir Chizhov, Russia's ambassador to the EU. The previous partnership agreement, which was established in 1994 and came into force in 1997, expired in December 2007; talks began in July 2008 on a new agreement, intended to set out "a comprehensive framework for EU-Russia relations, [including] substantive, legally binding commitments in all areas of the partnership, including political dialogue, JLS issues [justice, freedom, and security], economic cooperation, research, education and culture, as well as solid provisions on trade, investment and energy". The EU side hopes that the St Petersburg meeting will give impetus to the negotiations, which have been held up by lack of consensus over trade and investment, an area potentially further complicated by Putin's plans for a "Eurasian Union" between Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.

With EU energy commissioner Guenther Oerringer and new Russian energy minster Alexander Novak both attending the summit, the question of oil and gas supply will be a key item on the agenda. Unlike Nord Stream (the direct Russia-Germany pipeline), the South Stream pipeline, conceived to transport Russian gas to Europe via the Black Sea, has not so far been promised EU assistance under the Trans-European Energy Networks scheme. At a pre-summit briefing, Ambassador Chizhov said, "We are looking forward to seeing the South Stream project progressing and we certainly believe that it deserves the same treatment within the EU as Nord Stream and some other pipelines...whose future appears not to be worth much".

Delegates are also expected to focus on visa policy, the EU debt crisis, and foreign policy issues. The prospect of visa-free travel between the EU and Russia has been under discussion since 2010, but concerns remain over drug- and people trafficking, and the matter is unlikely to be resolved at this summit. The EU will require Russia to put in place strict passport checks and high levels of data protection if a no-visa agreement is to be made. Economic problems in the Eurozone are a cause for some trepidation in Russia, as the EU remains Russia's most important trading partner, and, as Dmitri Medvedev pointed out at his last summit in December, 41% of Moscow's foreign currency reserves are held in Euros. In terms of foreign policy, developments in the Middle East, and particularly the recent deterioration of the situation in Syria, will be an important topic - likewise the EU states' planned troop withdrawals from Afghanistan, for which Russia's support will be necessary.

These are all traditional subjects for the twice-yearly summit. Much has happened in Russia, however, since the last meeting of this kind in December 2011. Allegations of falsifications in the parliamentary and presidential elections and the massive street protests which greeted the results have generated international concern, as has the Russian authorities' reaction. Last week, a new bill on fines for unauthorised rallies was passed at its first reading in the Duma; if passed into law, it would raise the penalty for participation to about the average annual salary, with fines for protest organisers would be even higher.

Human right issues are an essential element in EU-Russia cooperation. Since 2005 the EU and Russia have held regular, six-monthly human rights consultations, which have provided for a substantial dialogue on human rights issues. The EU has raised with Russia issues including the human rights situation in Chechnya and the North Caucasus; freedom of expression and assembly, including freedom of the media; the situation of civil society in Russia, notably in light of the laws on NGOs and extremist activities; the functioning of the judiciary and its independence; the observation of human rights standards by law enforcement officials; racism and xenophobia; legislation relating to elections. For its part the Russian side raises matters of concern to it in developments inside the EU.

It is likely that the meeting will also discuss the situation in the South Caucasus where the EU is playing an increasingly important role despite Russian  attempts to narrow the scope of this involvement.

The EU delegation is likely to want to bring up these issues, but how this will play out while pursuing the hoped-for "reset" of relations with Russia remains to be seen.

source: commonspace.eu with EEAS and Ria-Novosti.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)