The OSCE Monitoring Mission in Ukraine remains focused, despite criticism.

by Joseph d'Urso, reporting from Kiev for commonspace.eu.

The chief spokesman of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine today spoke of “more calm” in the east of the country, two weeks after a ceasefire agreement was agreed in Minsk. He also denied the organisation has lost public trust.

The OSCE’s Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in Ukraine is mandated to gather information and report facts on the ground. There has been a lull in fighting over the past 24 hours, with no combat fatalities reported on Wednesday. Speaking to journalists in Kiev, spokesman Michael Bociurkiw defended his organisation’s work against accusations it does not sufficiently attribute blame for ceasefire violations, saying the OSCE is “not in the business of naming names and pointing fingers”.

MORE THAN A MILLION DISPLACED

Bociurkiw spoke of the devastation which OSCE monitors observed yesterday in Debaltseve, the town from which Ukrainian troops withdrew on February 18th . “None of the buildings that we saw were untouched by shelling,” he said. “Many villages have been almost totally emptied of the civilian population.” Bociurkiw also referenced a UN report which states “more than a million people have been displaced within Ukraine”.

The OSCE reported seeing a range of ceasefire violations yesterday, including some artillery fire sporadic small arms fire near the city of Mariupol, which is seen as the next potential flashpoint in eastern Ukraine. The OSCE also observed the movement of military equipment. The next challenge is to oversee the withdrawal of heavy weaponry, as specified by the agreement reached in Minsk on 12 February. The places to where heavy weaponry is withdrawn “may need to be visited again and again by the mission for obvious reasons – for credible verification,” Bociurkiw said. “It is not enough to be invited to follow a removal process, it has to be complete. Like the Minsk agreements it is not a shopping list, you can’t pick and choose.”

A MANDATE TO MONITOR

Many in the Ukrainian capital are distrustful of the OSCE. A sticking point is that Russian monitors take part in OSCE patrols, because the Russian Federation is not an official party to the conflict, whereas Ukrainians do not A prime time broadcast of political programme ‘the X­Files’ on Ukrainian cable channel 1+1, which accused the OSCE of Russian bias, has compounded this problem, according to Iryna Ivashko of the International Centre for Policy Studies in Kiev. An incident in September in which two separatist fighters got into an SMM vehicle has been used as evidence of supposed pro­Russian bias.

The OSCE admitted to and apologised for this incident. Bociurkiw said “I don’t know I’d agree there is widespread cynicism and distrust,” describing ‘dialogue facilitation’ as one of the Mission’s most important background roles. “We’ll soon have been almost a year in Ukraine, and the contribution of the mission is widely known and appreciated,” he said, adding that the OSCE has an active presence active in Kharkiv and Lviv as well as the capital and war­torn eastern regions.

SWIFT AND DECISIVE

Within the international community there has been increased scepticism of the durability of the Minsk agreements. Ilkka Kanerva, president of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, said in Copenhagen yesterday "I am profoundly disturbed by the illegal separatists' continuing refusal to grant unlimited, safe access to OSCE monitors on the ground in Ukraine and their violations of the Minsk Package of Measures.  “By extension, I am also disturbed by Russia's apparent unwillingness to publicly insist that the rebels immediately allow the monitors access, stop all ceasefire violations and withdraw all heavy weapons. Any attempts by the rebels to threaten the city of Mariupol must be met with a swift and decisive response by the international community.”

It remains to be seen whether the current lull in fighting is temporary, or a lasting ceasefire under the Minsk protocols can be reached. General Philip Breedlove, NATO's top commander, said on February 20. "it is a ceasefire in name only".

source: Joseph d'Urso filed this report from Kiev for commonspace.eu

photo: The Spokesperson of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine,  Michael Bociurkiw at a brieifng in Kiev on Thursday, 26 February 2015.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)