Kremlin concerned to keep work on sites for Sochi Olympics on schedule

Some of the Olympic facilities entered in the construction plan for the 2014 Olympic Games to be held in Sochi have not been built and 76 of the 393 construction projects have fallen behind schedule, the business daily Vedomosti wrote on Friday. "The problem was discussed at a closed-door meeting chaired by President Dmitry Medvedev in Sochi on January 5," it said, citing a participant in the meeting and a Kremlin official. The main speaker at the meeting, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak, who is in charge of the Sochi Olympic Games, cited problems of financing by private investors, slow-moving project development and poor organization of the work at individual construction sites among the reasons for the delay.

According to the newspaper a decision was made to increase the workforce employed from 56,000 to 70,000. A federal executive involved in Olympic construction told Vedomosti that of the 78 delayed projects, 28 are security facilities which private investors are not allowed to build. It's not that the construction will not be completed by 2014, but the program of test competitions set for 2012 and 2013 will have to be curtailed, he said.

Among other problematical Olympic projects are the port of Sochi and the Kudepsta electric power plant, Vedomosti said. The port project was scrapped after the first phase already built was destroyed by a storm. The electric power plant has changed owners three times since 2010 and has been moved to new sites twice. Despite Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko's pessimism, Sergei Chernin, the general director of the Gazenergostroi corporation which is building the electric power plant, claimed the project will be commissioned on schedule, if red tape is uprooted.

In a comment commonspace.eu political editor said that "Russia has a good track record of organising huge internatiuonal events such as the Olympics. On this occasion, particularly given the fact that Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was personally involved in securing the Olympic bid for Sochi, the Russian leadership is very keen that the event will be nothing but a huge success. However Sochi was a controversial venue from the start given its proximity to the volotile North Caucasus region, where Russia has been fighting a resilient Islamist inspired insurgency which over the last decade has spread out from Chechnya to engulf the entire North Caucasus region. Sochi is also minutes away from Abkhazia, a territory that Russia has recognised as an independent state but which the rest of the international community still regards as part of Georgia. Some Russian analysts have expressed concern that Georgia may somehow try to disrupt the games. Technical problems with the construction of the facilities will therefore be very unwelcome for the Russian leadership, coming on top of these security and political problems. The Sochi Olympics are however such an important prestigious event for Russia that in the end all efforts will be put to ensure its success, although the final cost may be quite exorbitant."

source: commonspace.eu with Vedomosti

photo: The official logo of the Sochi 2014 Olympic Games

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)