Campaigning ends in Karabakh ahead of elections on Thursday. Azerbaijani Government says polls hinder the peace process .

Campaigning ended in the elections in the self declared republic of Nagorno-Karabakh, ahead of polls on Thursday to elect the territory's fifth President. Wednesday is a day of reflection and no political activity is allowed.

There are three contestants: incumbent President Bako Sahakyan; former Deputy Defence Minister Vitali Balasanyan; and Deputy Director of Academic Affairs of the Stepanakert campus of the State Agrarian University of Armenia, Arkadi Soghomonyan. Valeri Khachatryan, a fourth candidate, submitted a request to formally withdraw from the race to the Central Election Committee on Monday 9 July.

Sahakyan is the favorite to win but has been seriously challenged by Balsanyan, who has attracted the support of many amongst Karabakh opposition forces who consider Sahakyan's rule as a period of stagnation. Sahakyan has conducted a traditional campaign promising stability and continuity. Both candidates promised to re-enforce the security of Karabakh against Azerbaijani threats.

Bako Sahakyan reserved his last activity in the campaign for a meeting with veterans of the war with Azerbaijan. Addressing them in the Palace of Culture in Stepanakert he promised that housing and other problems of veterans will be dealt with in his next term if elected. Veterans constitute a large and important part of the electorate.

The Azerbaijani government has dismissed the elections as another Armenian attempt to justify the status quo and said that they hinder the peace process. The spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry Elman Abdullaev "elections in the occupied lands of Azerbaijan is an attempt of the Armenian side to fix the current status quo whose unacceptability is recognized by the world community".

In the meantime the issue of the monitoring of the Karabakh elections is also creating some controversy. Speaking at the OSCE Human Dimension Meeting in Vienna last week the delegate of Azerbaijan appealed to the OSCE member states not to allow their citizens to travel to Karabakh to monitor the elections. However Cypriot media has reported that a greek Cypriot member of the European parliament, Eleni Teoharus was going to be in Karabakh for the elections. Ar,menian media have also shown pictures of a Canadian parliamentary delegation in Yerevan meeting with Armenian Foireign Minister Edward Nalbandian before travelling to Stepanakert for the elections. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry has again warned that ity will put foreigners visiting nagorno-Karabakh on a black list and they would not subsequently be able to travel to Azerbaijan.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Bako Sahakyan at an election campaign meeting at the Palace of Culture in Stepanakert, ahead of elections on Thursday. (photo courtesy of Artsakh Today).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)