Azerbaijan’s Parallel worlds. Part 1: The Successes. LINKS Analysis, looks at the achievements of Azerbaijan in the last decade.

LINKS analysis, looks at the achievements of Azerbaijan in the last decade and what the Azerbaijan government would like foreigners to see when they visit the country.  

The Eurovision Song Festival is in in full swing in Baku, and thousands of journalists, musicians and fans are in the Azerbaijani capital for the occasion. Most of them would not have heard that there existed a country called Azerbaijan until recently, let alone that they would visit it.

When it became known last year that Azerbaijan had won the Eurovision festival, and that it would host the 2012 event, the Azerbaijani government immediately made it clear that it would use the occasion to show-case the new Azerbaijan to the world. It was too good an opportunity to be missed, with tens of millions of viewers throughout the world. And there was indeed a lot to show.

Thanks to the oil wealth of recent years Azerbaijan has been going through a period of transformation. On the surface this reflects itself through the changing Baku skyline. Soviet Baku was a functional, rather than a pretty city, and the Azerbaijani government set out to change this. Dozens of iconic buildings sprang up throughout the capital. New cultural facilities have been mushrooming over the last years, and hundreds of old residential buildings have been spruced up. The architectural feel of the city has changed. Yet this outside change is only part of the story.

Azerbaijanis have been changing too. In Soviet times Azerbaijan was generally considered backward. The Communist leadership of the Azerbaijani SSR had to struggle with Moscow to secure places for Azerbaijani students at top Soviet Universities through a quota system rather than on qualification. The first years after independence were years of political turbulence, culminating in a massive defeat in the war with Armenians which resulted in the loss of large chunks of territory. Tens of thousands of displaced people descended on Baku and other towns adding to the misery of people.

Tackling these issues has been the main challenge that the government of Azerbaijan, headed first by Heidar Aliev, and afterwards by his son Ilham, set for itself.

The government had one big advantage: the revenue from oil. Managing the oil sector was therefore the first objective. An agreement with Western companies and countries, known as the “deal of the century”, secured a smooth production process. The construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline ensured the transportation of oil to European markets, bypassing the Russian bottle neck. Revenues started flowing in, first in small amounts, but in the last five years in billions.

From being the country of losers and refugees the government sought to turn Azerbaijan into a country of winners. A new sense of confidence was encouraged.

This reflected itself in foreign policy, where the government became much more assertive on the international arena. The message to Turkey, the US, Russia, Iran and others in the last years was not to take Azerbaijan fore-granted. Friendship was reciprocal and Azerbaijan expected to get as much as it would give. The election of Azerbaijan to the UN Security Council at the end of 2011 was seen as the culmination of this successful policy.

On the domestic front the government moved to rehouse refugees, to start building the non-oil sector of the economy, to invest heavily in defence spending and to implement a cadre policy aimed at preparing a new generation of Azerbaijanis technocrats. Hundreds of young Azerbaijanis were sent to study overseas, and specialised institutions, such as the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy were established.

Success was also sought in the fields of sports and culture. Sports facilities were brought up to world standard and various international events were held in Baku. Azerbaijani started winning gold medals in competitions.  The Eurovision victory symbolised yet another benchmark reached.

The government of Azerbaijan feels that it has achieved the objectives that it set out to achieve. The country’s statehood is secured, the country is on the road to development and it is now a respected international player.

Tomorrow, in part 2: The failures.

Source: This is the first of a three part special report prepared exclusively for commonspace.eu by LINKS analysis ©

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)