Azerbaijani public diplomacy activists opt for transparency as best defence. Official Baku says that public diplomacy is wrong, but civil society activists in Azerbaijan and worldwide are not impressed.

Azerbaijani civil society activists that are, or have been involved in public diplomacy projects together with counterparts from Armenia, are increasingly opting for tansparency as the best means of defending themselves against accusations of treason levelled at them by official sources.

In recent years the Government of Azerbaijan was tolerant, even if discouraging, to initiatives where Armenians and Azerbaijanis met in an effort to open a dialogue between societies and establish a much needed mood of confidence that is considered necessary for a solution to the decades long Karabakh conflict. Meetings of this nature have been organised in dozens of countries, and much more rarely in Armenia and Azerbaijan as well. They have involved civil society leaders, journalists and professionals, and on ocassions also politicians and members of parliament.

The Baku authorities have however recently taken a much more negative view of these sort of meetings and contacts. In recent weeks the negative rhetoric increased considerably, especially after the arrest of journalist Rauf Mirkadirov who has been accused of working for Armenian intelligence after his participation in a public diplomacy event in Yerevan.

Commenting on his arrest the Chairman of the Azerbaijani Parliament's Committee on Legal Policy and State Building, Ali Huseynli, told the Azerbaijani News Agency APA that "The fact that some lawyers and human rights activists are trying to explain the activity of journalist Rauf Mirkadirov, who was arrested over treason, as "people's diplomacy" is wrong. The public should know that the negotiations on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh are conducted by officials." Huseynli noted that in accordance with law the negotiations on the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement are conducted at the level of presidents and foreign ministers: "Only in exceptional cases, Azerbaijani parliamentarians can pay mutual visits within the framework of international organizations." Husseynli added that "projects implemented by the West and the United States under the guise of 'people's policy' are not only pointless, but also dangerous. Our public should know it. "People's diplomacy is possible only after the occupied territories of Azerbaijan are liberated, a peace treaty is signed and Armenia officially apologizes for the crimes it committed in Azerbaijan, including the Khojaly genocide. Only once, after the statements issued by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, a group of Azerbaijani intellectuals visited Armenia with the support of Moscow. But it did not continue, because Azerbaijan-Armenia talks stopped again after a certain period."

Husseynli insisted that the contacts of journalists, representatives of NGOs and other civil societies under the pretence of "people's diplomacy" cannot be effective: "On the contrary, the incident on Rauf Mirkadirov showed that it is dangerous, Armenian special service took advantage of this opportunity. The visits and meetings of representatives of NGOs and other civil societies, individuals, journalists under the guise of "people's diplomacy" served the interests of Armenian special services. Perhaps, it happened without their knowledge. Huseynli said that "people's diplomacy" can only be done by persons who received a mandate from the people.

Civil society activists both in Azerbaijan and outside are not impressed, and there has been heavy criticism of the Azerbaijan government over the arrest of Mirkadirov, and a few days later the detention of Leyla and Arif Yunus as they were about to board a plane at Baku airport. Political observers have noted that given the great harm that is being done to Azerbaijan's image every time such incidents happen, it makes one wonder what the real motives are behind this new policy.

In the meantime Azerbaijani activists have concluded that the best defence against such accusations is transparency.  One such person is Zardush Alizadeh, who in the last days informed the media of his public diplomacy activity in  the past, the present and the future. Alizadeh told APA that neither the Constitution of Azerbaijan nor any other laws,  forbid "public diplomacy". He also noted that he had played an active role in public diplomacy since 1989 and that he had regularly been attending events in Russia, Georgia, and Armenia. Alizadeh said that he and others who participate in public diplomacy meetings do not have state secrets. He said that the aim of Azerbaijani participants in such meetings is to encourage Karabakhi Armenians to live together in peace. 

source: commonspace.eu with APA and other news agencies.

Photo: Rauf Mirkadirov (picture courtesy of RFE/RL.org)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)