Azerbaijani Politician sees constitutional reform as way out of political impasse.

"The Government of Azerbaijan needs to move quickly, after the forthcoming Presidential election next month, with introducing constitutional reforms that would create conditions for proper parliamentary elections in 2015. These reforms should include the creation of an upper house of parliament." This view was expressed by Erkin Gadirli, Vice Chairman of the opposition REAL Movement in Azerbaijan, during a presentation at Chatham House in London. Gadirli said that the constitutional changes were necessary since it was clear that the ruling elite in Azerbaijan was not ready to release its current hold on power, and the creation of a second chamber in Parliament, that would act as a counter-balance to the first, was the only way in which the current Azerbaijani authorities would tolerate the presence of their political opponents in Parliament.

Gadirli lambasted the Azerbaijani authorities for refusing to register REAL's Chairman, Ilgar Mammedov, who is currently in prison awaiting trail, as a candidate in the October 9th election. He said that the Movement will exhaust the remaining legal remedies to try to have his candidature re-installed, but that if this did not happen they would then have no other choice but to ask their members to support the other opposition candidate Camil Hassanli, who has been nominated by a coalition of opposition parties grouped together in the "National Council". Gadirlli said that REAL had serious ideological differences with the "National Council" platform, which is why it did not join it, but that Hassanli was a respected national figure who now was the only credible option for those rejecting the candidature of the current President Ilham Aliev. Gadirli insisted that Aliev's election for a third term was anti-constitutional since the constitutional changes in 2009 could not be retroactive.

During his presentation, and an intensive question and answer session that followed, Gadirli spoke about changes in Azerbaijani society. Young people, he said, were much less dependent on the government than previous generations had been. They were also now the main source of information in the family, changing the old patriarchal ways in which politics was traditionally conducted. The internet had offered young people an opportunity to break out of the controls imposed by the tight hold on the media by the current government. Gadirli said that the government had lost the battle for the information space on the internet, despite its many efforts.

Asked about the improvements in the quality of life of the Azerbaijani people over the last ten years Gadirli said that he accepted that many things had changed for the better, but the government was still far from satisfying people's expectations. These expectations were not only material. People demanded from their government rule of law, respect, and the ability to express themselves freely. Gadirli highlighted the plight of several dozen young activists who were currently imprisoned on trumped up charges because they had dared to challenge the government.

Gadirli said that the government of Azerbaijan had been a reliable partner to the west in a number of spheres, including energy projects and the fight against terrorism. But the Government had disappointed western partners on the democracy agenda. He called on European institutions in the future to focus on property rights since he said that this will need to be the cornerstone on which the future could be build.

During his presentation Gadirli announced that REAL will transform itself into a political party soon after the Presidential elections, and that it would concentrate on the emerging middle class for its core support but that it also had plans to expand its work to all the regions of Azerbaijan.

source: commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)