Azerbaijan prepares to take over the chairmanship of the UN Security Council

Azerbaijan will take over the Chairmanship of the UN Security Council in May, marking a high point in the country's foreign policy. Although the chairmanship rotates monthly on alphabethical basis and is not elective, it will reflect the fact that Azerbaijan has become an important regional and international player.

The Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations, Agshin Mehdiyev, this week met with the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to discuss the upcoming Chairmanship. Trend News agency reports that  during the meeting the sides exchanged views on the work of the Security Council, strengthening the fight against terrorism and the maintenance of international peace and security. Trend said in its report that they also "discussed possibilities of further deepening cooperation with the organisation, the situation in the South Caucasus and a number of other issues."

The chairmanship of the Security Council is usually guided by the priorities of the world body. Its work is done mosty behind the scenes in consultations with the other members of the 15-country body, and particularly with the five permanent members of the Council, Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, who hold veto power in the Council and thus are able to halt any proposal or initiative.

The Security Council deliberates on problems of global peace and security as they arise. At the moment the most important issue is Syria, where the UN is slowly getting involved in trying to find a solution to the serious civil conflict in the country. The Security Council has been split on Syria, and has only in the last weeks started developing a consensus, including on the deployment of UN observers in the country. Other issues that may come up in May are Korea, and Iran. Azerbaijani diplomacy will be stretched to its limits as it will deal with these issues on which opinion in the world body is divided. It is likely that Foreign Minister Elmad Mammadyarov will represent Azerbaijan in some of the sessions of the Security Council chaired by his country. This is customary.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "It is not clear to what extent Azerbaijan will use this opportunity to put forward new initiatives related to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Certainly the chairmanship gives some opportunity to influence the agenda of the Security Council. However the chairing country needs to be extremely careful not to be seen hijacking the work of the Council. The permanent members in particular expect that the President of the Security Council will spend time and energy narrowing differences between the Council members, and reflecting accurately the views of the Council to the outside world. In the past countries that tried to use their month long chairmanship of the Security Council to push their own agendas have not only failed but also became quite unpopular in Council circles, something which could affect their performance after the period of chairmanship ends.  However there will be some allowance made to the priorities of the country presiding the Council within limits. How Azerbaijan plays this card will say a lot on its foreign policy and the ability of its diplomacy."

source: commonspace.eu with Trend News Agency

photo: The United Nations Security Council in session (Archive picture courtesy of the United nations Press Service).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)