Analysis: The symbolic importance of Jojuk Marjanli for Azerbaijan

A small village close to Azerbaijan's border with Iran has recently assumed huge symbolic importance for the Azerbaijani government and public. Since 1993 Jojuk Marjanli in the Jabraili district, has been uninhabited after it was occupied by Armenian forces in the Karabakh conflict. It lay close to the line of contact under the watchful eye of Armenian forces who dominated over it from a hill called Lale tape, which lies 2.9 kilometers north west of the village. It was not safe for the villagers to stay there, although one family reportedly did. In April 2016, during intensive fighting in the Karabakh conflict zone, Azerbaijan managed to regain control over Lale tape hill, and it finally became safe for the residents of Jojuk Marjanli to return home.

The Azerbaijan government has just announced ambitious plans to rehabilitate Jojuk Marjanli. Under a presidential order, dated 24 January, 4 million manats ($2.12 million) was allocated from the President's 2017 Contingency Fund to the State Committee for Refugees and IDPs for the construction of 50 houses, a school building and relevant infrastructure in the village.

For Azerbaijan, the story of Jojug Marjanli represents the start of the realisation of a passionate wish to return to the lands that it lost as a result of the Karabakh war in the period 1989-94. Many Azerbaijani politicians have hailed the rehabilitation of the village, voicing hope that it is the beginning of the "great return"..

"I regard it [the April battles] as a victory of the entire Azerbaijan nation and believe that all our territories will be liberated from occupation," said Ziyafat Asgarov, first vice-speaker of the Azerbaijani parliament, while commenting on the reconstruction of the village. "Ilham Aliyev's order on measures to restore the Jojug Marjanli village of the Jabrayil district is a historical step, a historical decision. This is the beginning of big events", said Deputy Prime Minister, and Executive Secretary of the ruling New Azerbaijan Party, Ali Ahmadov.  "Azerbaijani state and government once again demonstrated their determination to liberate the occupied territories. By restoring our liberated lands, we deliver message of high spirit of the society to whole world, international organizations created for settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict and Armenian side. The position of our society is that Azerbaijan will liberate its occupied lands by any means. Our internally displaced people will to return to their homes. Thus, the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan will be restored and a great historical injustice will be corrected."

Ahmadov noted that the government will carry out the work necessary in Jojug Marjanli. "However, I think as our occupied lands are liberated from occupation, international organizations will provide support and allocate grants to the restoration of those lands. However, this is the work of the future", he added. Azerbaijan intends to invite diplomats and representatives of international organisations to visit Jojug Marjanli soon.

But for the moment the Azerbaijan government can show Jojug Marjanli as a proof that the liberation of its lands by military means is possible, not least to justify in front of its own people the high expenditure on the military budget in recent years.

Many Armenian and Azerbaijani soldiers died in the battle for the Lale Tape Hill in April 2016. It is part of the price that the two countries are paying for failing to resolve the conflict peacefully. Many observers think that there will be more fighting this year, if the negotiations do not gather momentum. More young people will die, fighting for empty villages and strategic heights. The joyous event of the return of displaced people to their homes is therefore tempered by the prospect that it may trigger further violence if politicians on both sides don't rise to their responsibility, and renew with vigour their efforts to resolve the conflict peacefully.

This analysis was prepared by the staff of commonspace.eu

A decrepit village sign for Jojuk Marjanli (picture courtesy of haqqin.az)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)