AFP:

"If there is a change of regime in Iran, that could have unpredictable and possibly negative consequences for Armenia," said Lawrence Sheets, Caucasus project director at the International Crisis Group, in an interview with AFP.

The source defined the situation in the South Caucasus. These are thwarted attacks on Israelis in Tbilisi and Baku, friction between Azerbaijan and its giant neighbour Iran, and fears of a new war over the conflict-bloodied region of Nagorny Karabakh.

The source recalled the incidents in Georgia and Azerbaijan around the situation in Iran. "Georgian police in February said they defused a bomb near the Israeli embassy in Tbilisi, part of a series
of attack plots that Israel blamed on Iran. Mainly Muslim but officially secular Azerbaijan has arrested several people over the past two months accused of plotting to attack Israelis in Baku on behalf of Iran and the Islamic radical group Hezbollah. The alleged plots have provoked speculation in the region that Iran and Israel are acting out a covert conflict on the Islamic republic's borders, deploying spies and recruiting locals as proxies."

Armenia, the source reports, is predominantly Christian but has long kept warm ties with Iran, collaborating on energy and transport projects to help alleviate its economic isolation caused by closed borders with foes Azerbaijan and Turkey.

The item further reads that as warnings grow of a possible Israeli strike against Iran, the three small south Caucasus ex-Soviet states have become increasingly nervous that open conflict could throw their troubled region into even deeper turmoil. The south Caucasus had long been a battleground for influence between Iran, Russia and Turkey, but the fall of the Soviet Union enabled the US and Europe to forge new allegiances where Moscow had dominated for decades.

"As always when relations between the greater powers around the Caucasus are in turmoil, the Caucasus is affected," said Svante Cornell, research director at the Stockholm-based Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
EU Council president: Russia is the only ‘winner’ of the US-Israel war on Iran

EU Council president: Russia is the only ‘winner’ of the US-Israel war on Iran

António Costa, president of the European Union Council, has said that Russia is the only country benefiting from the US-Isreali war on Iran, due to soaring energy prices and a shifting focus away from Ukraine.  In a speech on 10 March, Costa said that Russia “gains ‌new resources to finance its war against Ukraine as energy prices rise. It profits from the diversion of military capabilities that could otherwise have been sent to support Ukraine. And it benefits from reduced attention to the Ukrainian front as the conflict in the Middle East takes centre stage.” Costa stressed that the European Union must play a stronger role in defending the international rules-based order, which he said is currently under strain. He also called on all parties involved in the Middle East conflict to return to negotiations and avoid further escalation. His comments come as global energy markets react to the conflict and as diplomatic efforts continue regarding Russia’s war in Ukraine in tandem. Kremlin officials have said all sides are interested in continuing United States-mediated peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, although no date or location has yet been set for the next round of negotiations.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)