Global culture hits The Hague at the 2022 Embassy Festival

On Saturday 3rd September 2022, embassies from 55 countries came together in the centre of The Hague, the Netherlands, in a boisterous and technicolour celebration of world culture. Among the countries present at the festival this year were Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Algeria, Oman and Yemen.

Starting out as the European LIFE I LIVE festival - founded in 2012 to support The Hague’s bid to be the European Capital of Culture, in which only European embassies took part - the decision was taken in 2019 to invite the whole world to open their doors to their national cultures. Having hosted only 5 embassies in its first year, the number had rocketed to 67 by 2019, becoming a truly international festival of culture at the heart of the self-styled City of Peace and Justice.

Curving around the tree-lined avenue of the Lange Voorhout, a famous street in The Hague with many embassies and just a few minutes’ walk from the seat of the Dutch Parliament, countries drew people in with colourful tents boasting a vast array of national food, drink, clothes, brochures, freebies, and other memorabilia.

The Georgian food stall - run by The Hague’s Georgian restaurant - was exceedingly popular, with a line of hungry khachapuri lovers stretching back around 50 metres. The Armenians and Azerbaijanis both put on a national barbecue over glowing hot coals, filling the air with an aromatic smoke of meat and spices. Meanwhile, the Embassy of Kazakhstan assembled a mock-up yurt filled with national dress, musical instruments, cuisine, and arts and crafts, and also raised money for those affected by recent huge wildfires in the country’s northern Kostanay region. Pakistan also used the opportunity to raise funds for victims of catastrophic floods across the whole country, one of the worst natural disasters in the country’s history.

Image
Georgian tent at 2022 EF
The Georgian delegation at the Embassy Festival

Curiously, the titans of western Europe were conspicuously absent. There was no UK, no France, no Spain, no Italy, or no Germany. In any case, this provided the smaller European embassies the opportunity to flaunt their countries without being overshadowed, and the hidden gems of Europe had a chance to make their mark on passers-by. Slovenia and Croatia brought boxes of their own unique wines and piles of glossy tourist leaflets, while Bosnia & Herzegovina brought their own national cuisine to The Hague’s international scene.

Far from only marketing their countries to potential visitors and increasing awareness of their respective tourist industries, the Embassy Festival plays another important role for local diasporas. By going to the effort of setting up a tent and bringing a little bit of their homeland to The Hague, it shows often disconnected diasporas that their diplomatic representatives are present, listening, and engaging. Within seconds of walking up to the South African tent to survey the selection of wine, biltong, and droëwors, you were suddenly surrounded by Afrikaans. Indeed, given the historic links between the Netherlands and South Africa, it is not surprising that the Netherlands has a predominantly white South African community of around 30,000 people. Similarly, the most popular visitors of the Vietnamese and Indonesian tents were seemingly Vietnamese and Indonesian people living in the Netherlands, keen to get a little taste of home on the other side of the world.

Image
South Africa at 2022 EF
South African braai (barbecue) and wine at the Embassy Festival

Ever since the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine on 24th February 2022, tens of thousands of Ukrainians have come to the Netherlands seeking refuge, and Ukrainian stall’s queue, full of flags, vinoks, and vyshyvankas, reflected this. This pop-up piece of Ukraine run by the diaspora group “Ukrainians in the Netherlands” sold hundreds of plates of borscht, doughnuts, and potato pancakes, as well as other Ukrainian products such as horlivka. Even when the very future of the country and its people are under threat, Ukraine found the time and energy to open up to the people of The Hague. If anything, it was a display of defiance and hope, showing that the country and its culture will not be cowed by fear and violence.

Image
Ukraine at Embassy Festival 2022
The Ukrainian team at the 2022 Embassy Festival in The Hague, the Netherlands.

The Embassy Festival did not just stop at stalls, however. Throughout the afternoon, various countries performed cultural acts on any one of the three stages dotted around the Lange Voorhout. The South Caucasus also put in a very strong showing, with groups from Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan all drawing crowds. The Georgian choir Megobrebi (meaning “Friends”) opened the proceedings with a glorious performance of polyphonic singing, and the Armenian Cultural Association Abovian in The Hague brought their talented Youth Choir and Dance Ensemble to the stage. Later in the afternoon, Azerbaijan also performed a selection of national dances complete with fire and flags. Other acts included Irish dancing from the Kilkenny School of Irish Dance in The Hague, South Korean street theatre, the understated yet humorous Latvian choir Ziemeljura, and Nepalese pop music from the band Changa.

Image
Azerbaijani national dances
Performance of Azerbaijani national dances at the Embassy Festival

Mark Twain said that “travel is fatal to bigotry, prejudice, and narrow-mindedness”, and initiatives such as the Embassy Festival, by giving people the opportunity to travel to all four corners of the world in only one afternoon, by providing a brief but brilliant snapshot of the diversity of Planet Earth, in much the same spirit break down barriers and build up friendships. As the international City of Peace and Justice, there is no better place than The Hague to host an event that demonstrates that, no matter who you are or where you come from, you have both the right and the opportunity to explore and enjoy the cornucopia of world culture that exists all around us.

The Embassy Festival returns to The Hague in September 2023.

source: Patrick Norén, Deputy Editor of commonspace.eu, visited the Embassy Festival on 3rd September 2022.
photos: Embassy of Ukraine in the Netherlands, and Patrick Norén.

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)