Is the CSTO about to be entangled with the Karabakh conflict?

The visit of Nikolai Bordyuzha, the secretary general of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to Yerevan last week, and his subsequent trip to inspect the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, has increased speculation about potential CSTO entanglement with the Karabakh conflict. The CSTO is a Russia led military alliance. The other members are Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

In Yerevan, Bordyuzha, who is usually greeted and feted during his regular visits to the Armenian capital, was this time publicly rebuked by Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan. Both Sargsyan and Bordyuzha stated that the visit was directly connected with the serious incidents that took place in the summer in which a number of Armenians and Azerbaijanis were killed. Armenia is unhappy with the lack of solidarity by other members of the CSTO alliance.

According to the official website of the Armenian President:

"The president underscored that the position of a number of CSTO partners on issues being of paramount importance to allies, particularly on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, expressed in different international platforms, do not correspond to the common spirit of the negotiation process, contradict the statements and proposals of the OSCE Minsk Group, as well as to the documents endorsed within the framework of the CSTO."

Whilst the CSTO has in the past supported Armenia militarily with arms and training, as befits its status as a member of the alliance, it has largely kept away from being directly involved in the Karabakh conflict. This was mainly due to hesitation on the part of its other members to alienate Azerbaijan. Armenia now looks poised to leverage its influence as one of the CSTO's most active members to secure the backing of the organisation in its dispute with Azerbaijan. Many consider this to be an   ominous sign with possible significant implications.

Regional analyst Richard Giragosian suggested Bordyuzha's visit to the border offers the Russian government an increased leverage and a stronger bargaining position with Azerbaijan.  Russia is already the largest arms supplier to both Armenia and Azerbaijan, but whilst Armenia is heavily dependent on Russia economically, Azerbaijan has been able to forge a more independent foreign policy, thanks to its revenue from the sale of oil and gas.

In Yerevan, Bordyuzha was largely non commital, only saying that ahead of the upcoming session of the CSTO Council he is now studying the most acute security problems facing CSTO member states. "According to him, there are a few of them, including the situation pertaining to the mentioned heightened tensions in summer. Referring to the meetings held by the President of the CSTO Council Vladimir Putin in connection with those events, Nikolay Bordyuzha expressed the opinion that it is necessary to report and to discuss all those issues which can seriously affect the security of the CSTO member states at the upcoming session of the CSTO Council", the website of the Armenian President reported.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: 

"Russian President Vladimir Putin has over the last year exerted considerable effort to bring Azerbaijan more tightly within the Russian sphere, and there are some signs that this policy is succeeding. An important test will come if Azerbaijan is persuaded to accept Russian or Russian-led CSTO peace-keepers in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone. This possibility had been suggested when the cease fire between Armenia and Azerbaijan  was agreed twenty years ago, but was then rejected outright by the late president of Azerbaijan, Heidar Aliev. Nikolai Bordyuzha's visit to the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, even though not directly in the conflict zone, may suggest that such a possibility is now again under consideration, although there has been no indication yet that Azerbaijan is about to change its stance of refusing Russian/CSTO peacekeepers. Last weeks' developments also reflect certain Armenian impatience with its CSTO allies and soon to be Eurasian Union partners. All have good relations with Azerbaijan and have made it clear that they are not willing to sacrifice them for the sake of Armenia. Armenia may therefore be learning the hard way that solidarity, and even military alliances, have their limitations. Furthermore any CSTO entanglement with the Karabakh conflict is bound to further complicate an already difficult situation."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: President Serzh Sargsyan with the Secretary General of the Collectiuve Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) in Yerevan on 6 October 2014.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular