Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
Commentary

Is there a growing sense of urgency in Georgia to de-occupy Abkhazia and South Ossetia?

17 February 2023
Giorgi Arziani

In a recent interview with Bloomberg on 1 February, Georgian President Salome Zourabichvili for the first time stated that the diplomatic settlement to end the Russian Federation's full-scale war against Ukraine should include the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Georgian territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, which have been under Russian control for 30 years.

She called for the Georgian issue to be put on the negotiating table, asserting that a resolution to the Russia-Ukraine war cannot be achieved without Russia's retreat from all the occupied territories.

President Zourabichvili highlighted the need for Russia to "learn where its borders are" and underscored the importance of the Western world making sound decisions. She emphasised that following the anticipated defeat of Russia in Ukraine, the Russian Federation will be obliged to return not only the occupied territories to Ukraine, but also returning occupied territories to Georgia. The President cautioned that if the West fails to demand a full withdrawal of Russian troops as part of surrender terms, it would be making a grave error akin to the mistakes made in 2008 and 2014.

Zourabichvili's call is a significant departure from previous positions

The President's call for the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgian territories comes at a time when tensions between Georgia and Russia remain high. In 2008, Russian troops invaded Georgia and occupied one-fifth of its territory, leading to the Russian Federation's recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states, which have not been recognized by the international community. The Russian military claimed that the operation was aimed at "forcing peace".

It is worth noting that President Zourabichvili's recent call for the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgian territories represents a significant departure from the Georgian government's previous position on this issue. The ruling Georgian Dream party has traditionally been more cautious on this matter, and the president's statements may reflect a growing sense of urgency among Georgians to end Russia's long standing occupation, particularly in light of Russia's faltering offensive in Ukraine.

This marks the first time in recent memory that a high-ranking Georgian official has expressed such a strong stance on the issue of de-occupation, suggesting a possible shift in the country's approach to the issue.

source: Giorgi Arziani is founder of Tbilisi School for Social Research, also known as the Library about Georgia, a non-profit public policy organisation based in Tbilisi, Georgia. Its mission is to conduct in-depth research that leads to evidence-based solutions for the de-occupation, modernisation and democratic development of Georgia.
photo: agenda.ge
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged
Trending

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

9 June 2021
Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal
Trending

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

22 April 2024
Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal
Trending

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

22 April 2024
Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.