PACE not likely to renew its committee on Karabakh

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is unlikely to renew its ad hoc Committee on Karabakh. Speaking to journalists ahead of this week's session of the Parliamentary Assembly in Strasbourg the current President of PACE Jean Claude Mignon told journalists, “What I can tell you speaking in my personal capacity, not on behalf of the bureau, but personally, I am not in favor of renewing this ad hoc committee because we have the Minsk Group,” he said. “I do not see the point of multiplying structures to deal with the same issue. If you have one structure, it should do its work,” he said.

He believes that creating another structure that will be added to the existing one, will only generate confusion. Meanwhile, he stressed that dealing with sensitive issues, “the last thing we need is confusion. What we need is consistency and effectiveness.”

Commonspace.eu political editor said that "the creation of the PACE ad hoc committee on Karabakh was an attempt by the Parliamentary Assembly to use parliamentary diplomacy in support of the Karabakh peace process. From the begining however it was clear that PACE was not the right mechanism for such a venture. The Committee has been largely ineffective and has often served simply as a venue for posturing by the sides in the conflict. The work of the Committee has now also been overtaken by events. The establishment of the EURONEST Parliamentary Assembly which brings together the European parliament with Parliaments of the Eastern Partnership countries, including Armenia and Azerbaijan, is perceived as a much more effective framework for this kind of work. Within the international community there is also a feeling that the Council of Europe needs to refocus back to its core agenda of being the guardian of human rights and democracy in Europe. There has been a lot of criticism recently at the failure of PACE to engage more robustly with human rights issues in the South Caucasus. There is a view that this committee may have distracted PACE from its core mission and that therefore it is best not renew it."

source: commonspace.eu with news.am and agencies

photo: The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in session (archive picture courtesy of PACE)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)