Monday Commentary: The South Caucasus is hosting the world

World leaders will converge on Baku and Yerevan over the next months for the summits of La Francophonie and the Non Aligned Movement. A wonderful development, writes Dennis Sammut in this week's Monday Commentary, but it would be even better if South Caucasus leaders can also meet together to address the challenges of the region.

In 2018 Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are celebrating the 100th anniversary of the establishment of their modern statehood, that initially lasted only for a short moment between 1918-20. It is perhaps a proof of how different are the three countries that were reborn in 1991 following the dissolution of the USSR, that in this centenary year the region will be hosting some of the largest gatherings of world leaders.

Armenia, in October will host the summit of the Francophonie, an association that describes itself as "a community of destiny aware of the links and potential that come from sharing a language, French, and universal values". Not surprisingly France plays an important role in the organisation, but its members span all over the world from Canada to Vietnam and from Switzerland to Congo - L'Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie brings together 54 governments, 4 associate members and 26 observers.

On its part Azerbaijan will in the next days welcome the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the Non-Aligned Movement(NAM), part of a process that will lead to a full NAM leaders summit in 2019, at which point Azerbaijan will also take over the Chairmanship of the Movement for three years. NAM was established at the height of the cold war as countries that did not form part of the two competing blocs sought a voice on the world stage. With increased tensions between east and west, some think the movement may be entering a period of revival. NAM is one of the largest international organisations in the world with more than  120 member states and 17 observers.

Of course there have been big international events in the region before - political gatherings, large sports events and much else. However the fact that so many world leaders will attend these gatherings over the next weeks and months is significant, and a proof of the active role that the countries of the region now play in the international system.

Some may say that these global jamborees are a waist of time and money. Yet in any relationship, personal contact still matters, and the same goes for international relations.  Despite all shortcomings these sort of gatherings can help bring about better understanding between nations, and galvanise action on important global issues.

For the region itself these global international gatherings are a proof of the confidence of the states reborn in 1991 who have now long passed the point where they have to worry about their very existence, and are well on their way in the process of state-building.

However, it is ironic, sad, and for many unacceptable, that whilst Baku and Yerevan can host meetings bringing together leaders from deep Africa, the distant Pacific Ocean and the chilly Arctic circle, they cannot as yet host a regional summit for the three South Caucasus countries. What seems to be so obvious and necessary simply eludes them, another example of the high cost that the region pays for the as yet unresolved conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijani over Nagorno-Karabakh.

It is wonderful that the South Caucasus countries will be hosting the world as part of their centenary celebrations. It would be even better if the centenary can also be used for the leaders of the three countries to meet together to address the challenges of the region, and map out its future.

source: Dennis Sammut is the Director of LINKS (Dialogue, Analysis and Research) His Monday Commentary is published weekly on commonspace.eu. 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan strengthens its relations with China and US

Uzbekistan strengthens its relations with China and US

In recent days, Uzbekistan welcomed the Chinese and American governments in quick succession. During Chinese Premier Li Qiang’s visit on 17-18 October, the Uzbek presidential administration said that joint projects backed by firm agreements had reached nearly $60 billion. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio then arrived in Samarkand for C5+1 talks, accompanied at the time by American business leaders seeking contracts, particularly in critical minerals. During the visit, Uzbekistan announced 54 agreements covering trade, investment, and technology. The agreements are said to be worth a total of $12 billion, according to Uzbekistan’s Ministry of Investment, Industry and Trade. However, China still accounts for 23% of Uzbekistan’s foreign trade in January-August 2026, while US goods trade with Uzbekistan totalled at $1.05 billion in 2025, which is less than a fifteenth of the value of its trade with China. Rubio said Washington was not asking Central Asian countries to stop cooperating with other partners, but would instead compete for investment. Tashkent is likely to welcome investment from both sides, but the trade gap shows how challenging it will be if it were to decrease its dependence on Beijing. “Chinese Premier Li Qiang visited Uzbekistan on October 17–18, just ahead of United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who arrived in Samarkand on October 18 with a delegation of American business leaders seeking new contracts. While China already has a substantial presence in Uzbek manufacturing and energy, Washington is seeking to expand American involvement in critical minerals and technology. The visits highlight the growing competition between the world’s two largest economies for influence in Central Asia. On October 17, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev received Li Qiang. According to the Uzbek presidential administration, the portfolio of joint projects backed by firm agreements has reached nearly $60 billion. More than 6,000 joint ventures with Chinese participation have been established in Uzbekistan. (...) Construction of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway was another topic of discussion. Work officially began in December 2024. The route will cross mountainous areas of Kyrgyzstan and connect the railway networks of China and Uzbekistan. The 304-kilometer section through Kyrgyzstan alone is estimated to cost $4.7 billion and will require 50 bridges and 29 tunnels. (...) On October 19, Rubio attended talks in Samarkand under the C5+1 format, bringing together the U.S. and Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Rubio said nearly 300 American businesses were represented in Samarkand. Companies were discussing agreements potentially worth billions of dollars, with concrete announcements expected following the meetings. Among Washington’s priorities are critical minerals used in advanced technologies, including electronics and batteries.”

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)