The Importance of the 2026 Parliamentary Elections for Armenia's Democratic Future

This commentary was prepared by Ms Nare Aramian for the 12th issue of the Armenia Election Monitor 2026 newsletter.

The parliamentary elections of 7 June 2026 represented an important milestone in Armenia's democratic development. More than simply another political event, they served as a test of our democratic maturity and offered citizens an opportunity to influence the future direction of our country. Taking place at a time when Armenia continued to navigate significant political, economic, and geopolitical challenges, these elections demonstrated the importance of democratic participation and civic responsibility.

The very first article of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia defines our country as a democratic state governed by the rule of law. These constitutional principles remain central to the electoral process and to the broader aspirations of Armenian society. They reflect a vision of a country where power belongs to the people, justice is applied equally, social solidarity protects the vulnerable, and public institutions serve the interests of all citizens.

Democracy cannot exist without participation. Elections remain the principal mechanism through which citizens exercise their sovereignty and hold their representatives accountable. While voting is a constitutional right, it is also a civic responsibility. The quality of democracy depends not only on the integrity of institutions and political actors but also on the active engagement of citizens. Voter turnout was above average in the parliamentary elections – approximately 60%, meaning that a majority of eligible citizens chose to participate in shaping the country's future. At the same time, the turnout figures also highlighted the continuing need to strengthen public trust, civic engagement, and democratic participation so that even more citizens feel empowered to take part in the political life of the country.

The elections were also important in the context of Armenia's aspiration to deepen cooperation with Europe and advance towards closer European integration. The values promoted by the European Union – democracy, human rights, equality, transparency, accountability, and the rule of law – are closely aligned with the principles enshrined in Armenia's Constitution. The elections therefore represented not only a domestic democratic process but also an opportunity to demonstrate Armenia's commitment to these shared values.

A democratic Armenia is a country where citizens trust public institutions, where corruption is challenged, where local communities have a meaningful voice in decision-making, and where opportunities are accessible to all regardless of gender, age, disability, social status, or place of residence. Such a society is better positioned to achieve sustainable development, social cohesion, and lasting peace.

For me personally, these elections held special significance. My decision to stand as a parliamentary candidate was a continuation of my long-standing commitment to the values and principles that have guided my civic work for more than twenty-five years. It provided an opportunity to bring the experience of civil society into the political arena and to advocate directly for reforms aimed at strengthening democratic institutions, protecting human rights, expanding equal opportunities, and ensuring meaningful citizen participation in public decision-making.

One of the most valuable aspects of the campaign was the opportunity to meet voters across different communities, listen directly to their concerns, and engage in open conversations about Armenia's future. These encounters reminded me that democracy is not confined to institutions or election days; it lives in the everyday experiences of citizens. I heard stories of hope, resilience, and determination, but also frustration, disappointment, and concern about the challenges facing our country. Many people spoke about their desire for greater social justice, stronger democratic institutions, equal opportunities, and a government that listens and responds to citizens' needs. These conversations reinforced my conviction that public policy must be rooted in the real experiences of people and that meaningful change can only be achieved when citizens are genuinely included in decision-making processes.

Democratic elections must be free, fair, transparent, and accountable, ensuring genuine political competition, freedom of expression, and an independent and impartial counting of votes. Voters should be able to make informed choices based on accurate and reliable information. All participants in the electoral process must have equal opportunities to campaign freely and communicate their ideas through independent and uncensored media. Only full adherence to these democratic principles can ensure that political power is established on the basis of the free and genuine expression of the will of the people, and that the peaceful alternation of power remains possible through democratic elections.

Contrary to the widespread belief that elections in Armenia have already reached a satisfactory standard, it is necessary to draw attention to a number of deeply concerning practices that accompanied recent elections. These included hate speech, persistent information pressure, openly aggressive rhetoric and behaviour, unequal campaign conditions favouring the ruling authorities, the unprecedented use of administrative resources, including employees of state and municipal institutions, as well as kindergarten and school children, and an increase in the number of political prisoners.

Whether in civil society or in politics, my belief has remained unchanged: democracy is not merely a system of government; it is a commitment to human dignity. Human rights, equality, justice, and democratic participation are inseparable. A society cannot be truly democratic if some voices remain unheard, if discrimination persists, or if citizens feel disconnected from the decisions that shape their lives. Looking back, the parliamentary elections reaffirmed the importance of civic engagement in Armenia's democratic journey. They demonstrated that democracy requires continuous participation, vigilance, and commitment from both citizens and public institutions.

Democracy cannot be taken for granted; it must be protected, strengthened, and renewed by each generation. The elections have now become part of Armenia's democratic history, but their significance endures. They reminded us that the future of our country depends on active and engaged citizens who are prepared to participate in public life and uphold the constitutional principles upon which our republic is founded. Armenian citizens must actively engage in democratic life, take responsibility for our country's future, and work together to build a just, democratic, and European Armenia founded on equality, solidarity, and respect for human rights – one that remains faithful to its constitutional values and confident in its future.

Source: Nare Aramian is a human rights advocate and peace builder with an interdisciplinary background in law, sociology, and peace and conflict studies. She is actively engaged in Track 2 peacebuilding initiatives, with particular focus on Armenia-Azerbaijan normalization, confidence-building, and community-level dialogue. Ms Aramian works with the Foundation Against the Violation of Law, where she focuses on democratic development, protection of vulnerable and war-affected populations, and strengthening community participation in decision-making. She also serves as Member of Yerevan City Council of Elders, and as the Representative in Armenia of Pro Paws Animal Welfare Charity (UK). 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)