Diplomacy resumes as Armenia turns the Safarov case to its own advantage.

Diplomatic efforts around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict have restarted after days of tension and sharp exchange of words between Baku and Yerevan following the release of Ramil Safarov, on his return to Azerbaijani jurisdiction at the end of August. Safarov was imprisoned for life in Hungary in 2006 for killing an Armenian colleague in Budapest during a NATO language course.

The Special Envoy of the OSCE on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk yesterday met in Stepanakert with the de facto leadership of the territory, including the President Bako Sahakyan. A spokesman for Sahakyan said that issue of the release of Safarov was raised during the meeting.

In the meantime the Armenian Foreign Minister, Edward Nalbandian, met in Yerevan the visiting Foreign  Minister of Luxembourg, Jean Asselborn. Speaking to journalistrs after the meeting Nalbandian said  that over the last days, he received dozens of phone calls from his counterparts from various states, including his counterparts from the EU countries, who unequivocally expressed their negative attitude towards the Azerbaijani-Hungarian deal. "There is not a single country which would express its support to Azerbaijan", Edward Nalbandian concluded.

Hungary's decision to send Safarov back to Azerbaijan, and the way that he was received there took the international community by surprise, and their has been widespread sympathy with the Armenian position, with statements from a number of key governments and international institutions. Armenia has been trying to turn the situation to its advantage by depicting Azerbaijan as an irrespionsible player in international politics.

On its part Azerbaijan has insisted that the whole procedure of the release of Safarov was conducted strictly within legal frameworks. Azerbaijan has also articulated its decision within the context of its conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, the continued occupation of its territory by Armenian forces and the humanitarian suffereing resulting from the conflict all of which condition Azerbaijani public opinion which has to be taken into consideration

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "The debate around this controversy is now entering a new phase, with both sides trying to capitalise on the issue both domestically and internationally. Regardless of this however, the most serious impact of the turn of events is that the lack of trust between the two governments, and even more, between Armenians and Azerbaijanis in general, has reached it lowest point for a very long time. This is already reflecting itself in the ongoing peace process facilitated by the OSCE Minsk Group, and in a range of public diplomacy activities that have been constructed with much patience and effort over a long time. Both will need to recalibrate to get back on track. On the other hand neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan can afford the luxury of disengaging completely from either the formal negotiations or the public diplomacy efforts. This allows a small space for facilitators to consider futrure steps. It is dissappointing however that some of those leading these processes seem to think that their only option at the moment is to do less, when in fact their best option is to do more."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The Fioreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian meeting the Foreign Minister of Luxembourg Jean Asselborn in Yerevan on 11 September 2012 (picture copurtesy of the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)