Azerbaijan to spend $59 billion to rehabilitate territories, but development also requires peace

This is a commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu. A shorter version of this commentary appeared on our weekly newsletter Caucasus Concise on 11 February 2021

 

Azerbaijan plans to spend up to $59 billion over the next ten years to rehabilitate the territories it has recently taken back after being for decades under Armenian control. It is a huge sum even for an oil rich country, but for President Ilham Aliyev developing the new territories now has become the primary mission of his presidency. Aliyev, still basking in popularity after the convincing victory in the 44 day war with Armenia last autumn, has been visiting the regained territories and giving instruction on their development.

The majority of Azerbaijanis who in the past had lived in the Karabakh territories that came under the control of Baku after November 10, 2020, would like to return, several sources in the local government told Izvestia. However, there is nowhere to return to, only the names and endless minefields remain. Nonetheless, the Azerbaijani authorities are confident that the active development of the seven regions in question will soon turn Karabakh into a driver of economic development for the entire country.

 "The regions should not only be revived and brought into sync with the socio-economic development of the entire country, but [they] also should be territories of advanced development,   Azerbaijani Economy Minister Mikayil Jabbarov told the Russian newspaper Izvestia, earlier this week. The economy minister noted that the Karabakh territories are considered advantageous from an economic point of view, since the mining and agriculture sectors are present there, and in the long run, tourism and logistics may enable the area to serve large flows of cargo. Moreover, Baku noted that Armenia would also benefit from the development of road and rail communications. These measures will help create jobs and industries not related to the oil industry, Jabbarov said.

But this will be easier said than done. Three months after the end of the 44-day Second Karabakh War, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia are still trying to tie up loose ends following their 10 November trilateral declaration. The process of searching for bodies of missing servicemen continues, and there are still issues related to the exchange of prisoners, particularly a large group of Armenians in Azerbaijan captivity who Azerbaijan says continued to fight after 10 November.

The bigger challenge, however, is related to post-war reconstruction. Both sides have a lot of work ahead, but the challenge facing Azerbaijan is enormous. Diplomats based in Baku were last weekend taken to visit some of the territories retaken by Azerbaijan after nearly three decades of Armenian control. They were genuinely shocked at the state of ruin of what had previously been bustling communities. Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev is making reconstruction and the return of the Azerbaijanis displaced from these territories in the 1990s the core objective of his government for the next 5-10 years.

Shusha will be the dream city at the top of the mountain

At the centre of this plan is Shusha, a small citadel and city sitting atop Stepanakert, and what remains of Armenian controlled Nagorno-Karabakh. While both sides claim their historical connections with Shusha, all anecdotal evidence suggests that this was in recent centuries a mainly Azerbaijani town. Militarily it dominated the settlements below it. Aliyev has a different strategy for Shusha going forward. He wants to turn it into a shining light to which Armenians below can look up in awe and envy. He has already declared Shusha Azerbaijan’s capital of culture.  

Going forward there are three problems:

Reconstruction will be difficult, not only because the level of destruction is high but also due to the problem of landmines which infest most of the areas that have reverted back to Azerbaijani control. Azerbaijan is complaining that Armenians are refusing to give up the maps of minefields, and in any case, that will only help a little bit. Already several Azerbaijani soldiers and civilians have been killed by landmines in the last three months, and the scale of the problem will be daunting;

The second problem for Aliyev is more home-grown. Given the potential of Shusha to become one of the most expensive pieces of real estate in Azerbaijan, greedy Azerbaijani officials have been looking how to get a part of the cake. A fuming Aliyev told journalists that departments ranging from the Ministry of Emergency Situations to the Central Bank had been asking to open branches in Shusha. What for? Aliyev asked, there is nothing and no one there. Aliyev issued a warning across the board that he will not allow officials to carve up Shusha, or any of the rest of the regained territories, and that reconstruction and rehabilitation had to be done according to a master plan;

The third problem is less easily solved. It is about security. If Shusha, and places like it in the regained territories, become the shining light to which Armenians will look in awe and envy, then this may not only lead them to seek peace and reconciliation in the hope of sharing the new bonanza, but may lead, at least some, back to violence. For Shusha, and for the rest of the regained territories, peace and stability are going to be hugely important.  Securing that peace is now central for Azerbaijani strategy.

Unsurprisingly, Armenian perspectives are different, as Benyamin Poghosyan argued in an op-ed on commonspace.eu a few days ago. Read more: In 2021 Armenia can only wait and watch whilst others decide the fate of Karabakh

The future of Shusha as the beacon at the top of the mountain, and of the other territories Azerbaijan has regained, may well depend on how quickly all the sides share in a vision for future peace. One can sense conflict fatigue across the region. This now needs to evolve into a genuine desire for peace, which political leaders must harness as they plan the future.

source: This is a commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu. A shorter version of this commentary appeared on our weekly newsletter Caucasus Concise on 11 February 2021
photo: The town of Agdam was left in ruins for the last three decades (archive picture)

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

You may subscribe to the Caucasus Concise newsletter, here

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)