Opinion: In 2021 Armenia can only wait and watch whilst others decide the fate of Karabakh

Currently Yerevan has almost no leverage to influence future developments around Nagorno Karabakh, argues Benyamin Poghosyan in this op-ed. In 2021, Armenia has no choice but to wait and watch the ups and downs in Russia – Turkey – Azerbaijan relations.

Since the end of the second Karabakh war in November 2020, Armenian, Azerbaijani, and international pundits have published many opinions and assessments focusing on the war, its causes and consequences, and the decisive victory of Azerbaijan. The strategic blunders of the Pashinyan government, the Russia – Turkey deal, and the aloofness of the US, are among the hotly debated issues about what contributed to the launch of the war, and the capitulation of Armenia. Some experts seek to forecast the distant future (5-10 years). They argue that Armenia will accept its defeat, will forget about territories taken by Azerbaijan during the war, and will seek to get material benefits through establishing economic cooperation with Baku and Ankara. Others believe that Yerevan will focus on rebuilding its economy and military, and on retaking at least part of the lost territories.

Meanwhile, the current situation in Nagorno Karabakh remains quite fluid. The establishment of the Russian military base headquartered in Stepanakert prevents any immediate resumption of   large-scale hostilities. The opening of the Russia – Turkey joint monitoring center in the Aghdam region proves that Moscow and Ankara are keen to continue their cooperation on the Karabakh issue. However, this does not mean that in 2021 Nagorno Karabakh will not come back to the spotlight of experts and international media. Azerbaijan understands quite well that the vast majority of Karabakh Armenians who currently live within the Russian protectorate’s borders will not agree to receive Azerbaijani passports and live a "happy and quiet life" as Azerbaijani citizens. Simultaneously, Karabakh Armenians do not want to listen to anything about Azerbaijani population’s possible return into these territories, including some parts of Stepanakert. Meanwhile, it is evident to everyone – Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Russians, and Turks, that those Armenians who fled their homes from the territories which are now under Azerbaijani control due to the 2020 war will not have the possibility to return in the foreseeable future.

As Azerbaijan still views the 3000 square km of the de facto Russian protectorate as an inextricable part of Azerbaijan, while having no possibilities to invade it by force, the only way forward for Azerbaijan will be to put pressure on Armenians living in these territories and to squeeze them out. Azerbaijan will accompany this policy with the official statements of willingness to secure Armenians' rights and the simultaneous rejection of any offer to discuss Karabakh's future status within OSCE Minsk Group. The President of Azerbaijan has publicly stated that the 2020 war threw the question of the Karabakh status to the dustbin of history, and Baku has no intention to pull it back out from there.

One of the possible scenarios is Azerbaijan’s attempt to organize small-scale subversive actions along the roads connecting Stepanakert and other Karabakh cities with Armenian villages. Azerbaijan will reject any state involvement there and argue that those actions have been implemented by either criminal elements or by the relatives of the killed Azerbaijani soldiers triggered by revenge. Another option would be to launch the same actions against Armenian villages along the new line of contact, given that Russian peacekeepers do not stand on each meter of that line. On a political level, Azerbaijan and Turkey may offer Russia a deal to abandon Karabakh's remaining territories and concentrate its forces in Stepanakert as the center of the Russian military base while keeping control over the Goris - Stepanakert highway. In this scenario, Stepanakert will become the second Gyumri with its 40-50000 population providing the Russian soldiers with all necessary services. It is not easy to assess the Russian reaction to such an offer. Russia has been yearning for the base located in Stepanakert since the early 2000s and may not be interested in the fate of other small Armenian cities in Karabakh such as Martuni, Askeran, and Martakert.

The key in this equation is the Russia – Turkey relations. If both sides keep their tacit agreement on how to move forward in the South Caucasus, the Kremlin may not be interested in preventing Azerbaijan from gradually squeezing the Armenian population out of the Martuni, Askeran, Martakert cities and surrounding villages. Meanwhile, due to the US pressure on President Erdogan or some internal upheaval in Turkey, Ankara may change its attitude towards Russia and offer its services to the US within a Russia containment strategy. In that case, the current Russian protectorate in Nagorno Karabakh will become a significant asset for Russia as a forward operating base in the South Caucasus in a renewed confrontation with Turkey.

As for Armenia, Yerevan has almost no leverages to influence Nagorno Karabakh's developments. Currently, Russia protects the remnants of the unrecognized Nagorno Karabakh Republic and parts of the Armenian Syunik region. The Kremlin can quickly cede these territories to Azerbaijan if Moscow decides to punish Armenia for any reason. Armenia is also passing through a domestic political crisis, and faces snap parliamentary elections in June or September 2021. Domestic turmoil makes Armenia even weaker in regional geopolitics and forces Yerevan to wait and see what Russia and Turkey will decide on Nagorno Karabakh.

The situation may change in 2022 if the Biden administration elaborates a new, more assertive policy for the former Soviet space, including the South Caucasus. If the US seeks to weaken Russian influence in the region, Armenia will face the choice to align itself with the US and most probably lose not only Karabakh but also parts of the Syunik region with its land corridor with Iran. Another option could be to more firmly anchor itself within the Russian orbit and forget about getting new loans and financial aid from the Euro-Atlantic institutions. However, all this may happen no sooner than in 2022, while in 2021, Yerevan has no choice but to wait and watch the ups and downs in Russia – Turkey – Azerbaijan triangle.  

Source: This op-ed was prepared for commonspace.eu by Benyamin Poghosyan, Founder and Chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.
Photo: Turkish, Russian and Azerbaijani flags fly outside the Russia-Turkey Joint Monitoring Centre in Agdam (picture courtesy of the Anadolu News Agency, Ankara)

 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)
Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakh president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, declared September 25 a national day of mourning following the deaths of servicemen during military exercises in the Caspian Sea. Twelve Kazakh servicemen died after being swept into the Caspian Sea during the Khazar Qorgany–2026 naval exercises in the Mangystau region on Thursday (September 24). The incident occurred after weather conditions suddenly deteriorated and winds intensified during a combat training mission. In a Telegram post, the Ministry of Defence reported that 19 servicemen had been swept into the sea. So far, three have been rescued, one of whom was hospitalized, while 12 bodies have been recovered.  Search operations were continuing for the remaining four servicemen. A large-scale rescue and recovery effort has been launched, involving Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, aviation assets and other relevant services.   Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev, who is leading a government commission at the scene, ordered a continuous, round-the-clock search for those still missing. Authorities were also instructed to provide financial and other assistance to the families of the deceased. (click image to read in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)