Armenia and Kazakhstan move to lessen their dependency on Russia

This analysis was prepared for commonspace.eu by Anna Szedlacsek, Deputy Editor and Junior Research Assistant at LINKS Europe.

Russia’s influence across the post-Soviet space has come under increasing pressure since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Two countries illustrate the changing relationship particularly clearly: Armenia, once one of Moscow’s closest military partners in the South Caucasus, and Kazakhstan, Russia’s largest and most strategically important partner in Central Asia. 

Armenia and Kazakhstan both reached their strategic turning points between 2020 and 2022, driven by security failures, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and severe economic vulnerabilities. 

Among these reasons, the war in Ukraine sheds a particularly long shadow. In Kazakhstan, Russia’s “special military operation” substantially damaged Moscow's image among ordinary Kazakh citizens and reignited anxieties about revanchist Russian rhetoric regarding northern Kazakhstan. Public discontent has flared during Russian state visits and against Russian state projects like Rosatom’s nuclear power plant bid. Similarly, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, in 2022, in a bold statement at the 25th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum – sitting directly adjacent to Russian President Vladimir Putin – made it clear that Kazakhstan does not recognize Russia’s annexation of Ukrainian territories or the "quasi-states" in Donetsk and Luhansk. More recently, in July 2026, he also publicly called on Putin to reconsider his war policy, suggesting it was time to "freeze this conflict" and return to negotiations.

However, beyond the scope of diplomatic relations, Almaty is heavily challenged by having to navigate its deep economic and transit interdependence with Russia. Kazakhstan shares a 7,500 km land border with Russia and remains bound by shared membership in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). Crucially, over 80% of Kazakh crude oil exports cross Russian territory via the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) to Novorossiysk, giving Russia massive structural leverage.

To mitigate this reliance, Kazakhstan is aggressively developing alternative transport links, such as the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor) through Baku, Azerbaijan, to reach European and global markets without crossing Russian territory. This also reflects a move away from Russia as its main trading partner – this position has been earned by China, or, if considered as a bloc, the European Union (EU).

Armenia, on the other hand, began its pivot away from Moscow’s orbit after the 2020 Second Nagorno-Karabakh War and reached a point of no return following Azerbaijan's final capture of Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023. This is due to the fact that despite hosting a Russian military base and belonging to the CSTO, Armenia received no military intervention from Russia during either of these conflicts. Moscow remained neutral – and thus turned untrustworthy in the eyes of Armenians – because it wished to safeguard its expanding economic, energy, and transit partnerships with Azerbaijan and Turkey. Concluding that Russia was no longer a reliable security guarantor and had its resources consumed by the war in Ukraine, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan suspended Armenia's participation in the CSTO in 2024 and began replacing Russian arms imports – which previously supplied over 90% of its arms – with defense systems from India and France. Furthermore, in March 2025, the Armenian parliament passed a law to initiate the EU accession process, while ministries are recruiting Western-educated professionals to restructure the civil service away from the Kremlin. Armenia has also concluded an energy cooperation agreement with Iran and is trying to strengthen its ties with China and India. 

Ultimately, despite these developments, it would be premature to conclude the end of Moscow’s control over these countries, as both Armenia and Kazakhstan face severe structural constraints that strictly limit how far or how fast they can move away from Russia. Russia remains Armenia's primary trading partner, accounting for roughly 35% of its total foreign trade, and supplies 82% of the country’s natural gas at preferential prices via Gazprom, which owns Armenia's internal gas distribution network. Meanwhile, Almaty will certainly not dare risk a Russian halt along the CPC corridor as such a move would be detrimental to its state revenues and economy. It also continues to supply fuel to Russia during its refinery shortages and has just recently evaluated proposals to process Russian crude at Kazakh refineries. 

The question, therefore, is not simply whether Russia is losing its allies. It is whether Russia is losing its ability to make those allies dependent on it.

As of September 2026, the evidence does not point to a definitive answer. Russia has not been pushed out of either country – but both Kazakhstan and Armenia appear increasingly eager to ensure that Moscow is no longer their only option.

This analysis was prepared for commonspace.eu by Anna Szedlacsek, Deputy Editor and Junior Research Assistant at LINKS Europe.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

The European Commission disbursed €1.24 billion to Ukraine on Wednesday (October 7) under the defence component of the €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan, earmarked for drones, drone interceptors, ammunition, and missiles produced by Ukrainian entities. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the payment would strengthen Ukraine’s defence industry and its ability to protect people and infrastructure. She described Russia’s ongoing attacks as a deliberate strategy intended to make daily life increasingly difficult for Ukrainians. The Ukraine Support Loan provides an indicative €60 billion for defence and €30 billion for budgetary assistance during 2026–2027. The European Commission plans to disburse €28.3 billion for Ukraine’s defence industrial capacity in 2026, with further payments under the defence component expected in the coming weeks. Funding decisions are based on Ukraine’s evolving requirements and remain subject to agreed conditions and monitoring. According to Ukrainian Prime Minister Serhiy Koretskyi, the latest payment brings Ukraine’s defence financing received through the programme to nearly €13 billion. He said the government would continue working with European partners to ensure the remaining planned funding is delivered on schedule and in full For the remainder of 2026, €32.5 billion in EU financial support remains available to Ukraine. This includes €28.1 billion under the Ukraine Support Loan – €15.4 billion for defence industrial capacity and €12.7 billion in budget support. A further €4.4 billion remains available through the Ukraine Facility, bringing the total budget support available for 2026 to more than €17 billion, subject to Ukraine meeting the relevant conditions. Since 2022, the EU and its member states have provided €228.7 billion in overall support to Ukraine, including €3.8 billion generated from immobilised Russian assets.
Editor's choice
News
In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

Government forces in Ethiopia, have taken control of the town of Mekelle, capital of the Tigray region. Earlier, Ethiopia's federal military said it had recaptured the main airport in the capital of the northern Tigray region, dealing a major setback to an ​opposition alliance in its stronghold. Clashes pitting a rebel alliance led by Tigray's ruling party ‌against the government and its allied forces broke out in northern Ethiopia last week, in the most serious escalation of violence since a 2020-2022 civil war. The fighting has stoked fears that it could escalate into a wider regional conflict, potentially drawing in neighbouring ​countries in the Horn of Africa and the Gulf. In recent days Ethiopia and Eritrea broke off diplomatic relations amid mutual accusations. In Washington, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott ​said the United States strongly urged Ethiopia and Eritrea to "exercise maximum restraint and return ⁠to dialogue and cooperation as agreed in their 2018 peace framework." "The Horn of Africa cannot sustain another ​military conflict and humanitarian crisis," Pigott said. "A conflict jeopardizes ongoing U.S. collaboration on shared interests with both countries." The ​federal government in Addis Ababa accused Eritrea of supporting the rebel alliance alongside Sudan and Egypt. The three countries deny this. Troops from the Ethiopian National Defence Forces had regained control of Alula Aba ​Nega Airport in Tigray's capital Mekelle,   A Mekelle resident who asked not to be named for security reasons, confirmed the ‌taking of ⁠the airport by government forces and added they could hear gunfire outside the city centre. This source said they had seen some Tigrayan Defence Force fighters abandoning their posts and heading home, and that there was looting of government facilities taking place in the city. Mekelle's airport, which ​is around 10 km (6 miles) from the centre of the city, was ​one of three ⁠airports in the region that were seized by the opposition forces at the start of the fighting on September 23. The taking of Mekelle by government forces would be a major setback for the opposition alliance, although analysts say ⁠it ​would be unlikely to end the conflict. In 2020, federal forces captured ​Mekelle within the first month of the two year war before the TPLF reclaimed it seven months later.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)