Deteriorating education: the dark legacy of Yemen’s war

The war in Yemen has had a severe impact on the learning, and general cognitive and emotional development of the younger generation, writes Shaima Ameen Abdullah for commonspace.eu. "In light of the polarisations that the country is experiencing, there is a need for a clear vision and an effective strategy in setting priorities for reforming the educational process in accordance with the country's circumstances and the available capabilities, especially in stable areas where more reform is possible," she adds.

Yemen is currently going through what can be described as a tragedy and misery with profound consequences on many aspects of daily life. The war has consumed both the lives and the consciousness of Yemeni citizens. One of the key affected sectors is education, where there is currently a crisis.

According to UNICEF estimates, about two million children are already out of school, with the number projected to increase to six million if the war continues. Even before the war, the situation of education in Yemen was already bleak. For decades, the educational system had been experiencing continuous deterioration. The current war only added an extra burden to this weakened system. 

This deterioration in education in light of the conflict can be attributed to many causes. Since the beginning of the war in 2014, attacks on schoolchildren, teachers, and educational infrastructure have had devastating effects on the country's education system and affected the accessibility of education to millions of children. The damage, closure, and transformation of schools into military barracks have also limited the accessibility to schools for millions of children. An estimated 2,916 schools (at least 1 in 4 schools) have been destroyed, partially damaged or used for non-educational purposes as a result of eight years of conflict in the country. 

The conflict and the ongoing disruption of education have also had a severe impact on the learning, and general cognitive and emotional development of the younger generation in Yemen, as well as on the mental health of the estimated 10.6 million school-age children in the country. UNICEF has also warned that further deterioration can have profound consequences on children in the long term.

Displacement Camps 

Students in displacement camps across the country also struggle to continue their education for many reasons. Often, there is no room for students in schools operating nearby, or students lack certain documentation that are required for enrollment. The Executive Unit for the IDP Camps Management stated in a study issued on 12 January 2022 that the number of children of school age at the camps is 491,600, of whom 246,499 are males and 245,101 are females.

Despite the overcrowding, humanitarian organisations, in cooperation with the offices of the ministry of education, coordinate the enrollment of the displaced students into nearby schools. However, these efforts are not enough and do not cover all the student population that is displaced in various camps. Schools in areas that did not suffer much from the war are already overcrowded so shifting students to new locations would not make much difference. 

The issue of displaced families and students cannot be resolved soon because fighting can break out at any moment, and most operating schools are far from the frontlines which makes it a security challenge for those from these areas wanting to attend school. 

Other factors contributing to the increase in vulnerabilities in the educational process include the fact that more than two-thirds of teachers have not regularly received their salaries since 2016, or have stopped teaching in search of other income-generating activities, forced displacement, or for political and sectarian reasons.

Education in Houthi-controlled areas 

In the areas controlled by the Houthis, the group has transformed the almost free school system into a system that imposes higher registration fees than the usual symbolic fees in place before the war. This has led to the dropout of many students whose families cannot pay the sums of money for them, due to poor economic conditions.

Yet perhaps the biggest impact on education in Houthi-held areas is the changing of the educational curricula for primary and preparatory mid-level students. The Houthis have systematically added lessons with ideological features that promote and advocate their extremist ideas. These recent changes reflect the Houthis’ political and ideological ambitions as they shape an order that normalises violence. The Houthis are thereby preparing a future generation to be loaded with ideas that guarantee the continuation of its project. 

Besides changing the curricula, the Houthis did not provide the books for schools and educational establishments as was required, but rather sold them commercially in local shops and stalls. This further generated a stream of income for the Houthis while further adding costs to families with children.

Educational Reform: a way forward 

In light of the polarisations that the country is experiencing, there is a need for a clear vision and an effective strategy in setting priorities for reforming the educational process in accordance with the country's circumstances and the available capabilities, especially in stable areas where more reform is possible.

Radical changes must be made in the essence of the educational process and its system, starting with reforming the goals, objectives and educational philosophy, but also addressing expected educational outcomes and the prospects of education. Such changes must match the needs for Yemeni society and the next generations. 

One of the key actions in this vein is to allocate more government budget for the development of education and making the curriculum and educational approach neutral and unbiased. Along with government reforms, media and civil society initiatives should also concurrently engage in discussions and dialogue about how best to reach solutions on the ground to address the challenges to education. Such ideas, recommendations and suggestions can then ultimately help the government enact policies relevant to the future of education in the country. 

Scholarships, foreign exchanges, new curricula, and media attention are required

Another important step is to allocate more funding to scholarships and foreign exchanges. This can help to widen expertise and knowledge which can in turn help rebuild in the post-conflict phase. Additionally, the government should renew educational expertise, in terms of teachers, trainers and academic supervisors.

This new cadre can then further develop the educational curricula in accordance with contemporary trends and needs of the society. Renewing and developing and the educational curricula is perhaps one the most crucial steps in the process due to the changes that the Houthis have enacted, but also because of the lack of renewal during the past several years due to the conflict. Besides making the curricula unbiased, it is also important to conduct regular review and assessment to ensure the curricula meets the demands of society. 

To ensure that education remains a top priority, the government must include provisions related to educational reform in any negotiations with the Houthis since the latter enacted changes in education in areas under their control. To elaborate, educational content that fuels sectarianism and divisions must be removed and instead implement neutral educational content.

During the process of reforming education, there needs to be media attention towards the current challenges to education in order to raise public awareness of how disastrous the situation can be if the current status quo continues. Lastly, it is also important that the local and international communities realise the magnitude of educational problems in Yemen, which are no less harmful than the size of the material and human damage suffered by Yemenis.

source: Shaima Ameen Abdullah is a journalist, broadcaster and TV presenter on a local Yemeni TV channel, Yemen Shabab TV. She has worked with several media organizations and platforms as a voice-over and content writer.
photo: FikraForum
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)