To what extent have Azerbaijan's relations with Russia deteriorated? Commonspace.eu political editor discusses recent developments in relations between Azerbaijan and Russia and their long term impact.

Commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu

The Russian media last week reported that Russian president Putin had stopped the sale of anti aircraft missiles to Azerbaijan. The report connected the decision to Azerbaijani claims that it will shoot down aircraft trying to use the airport in Nagorno-Karabakh without its permission. It also referred to the failure of the negotiations between Azerbaijan and Russia on the Gabala Radar facility. The facility is now due to shut down this month.

These developments however reflect a deeper rift in Azerbaijani-Russian relations.

Whilst the first two presidents of post Soviet Azerbaijan, Abdulfaz Elcebey and Heidar Aliev, tried to create a distance between their country and Russia, the current president, Ilham Aliev has staked a lot on building a good personal rapport with the Russian leadership, and between the two states.

Whilst the first two presidents wanted to punish Russia for its pro Armenian stance in the latter's confrontation with Azerbaijan, the task of Ilham Aliev was to try to break that relationship and turn Azerbaijan into a privileged partner of Russia. This was always bound to be a difficult and tricky operation.

Azerbaijan itself is sensitive about its regained independence and has no wish to lose any of it. It is also jealous for its economic independence. Azerbaijan has been able to secure economic independence through its arrangements with western companies for the exploitation of its natural resources. This has irritated Russia but Azerbaijan has no wish to lose that either.

But more importantly, what Azerbaijan seeks from the relationship with Russia is support for its position on Nagorno-Karabakh. In this it has got none. Now the frustration is increasing and the strain on the relations between the two countries is starting to show.

Russia, directly and through the CSTO military alliance has become increasingly more visible in its support for Armenia. On Nagorno-Karabakh it conveniently hides behind the facade of the Minsk Group, enabling it ditch any Azerbaijani pressure. That process has now grinded to a halt.

Gone are the cosy meetings and skiing excursions in Sochi, which had become the hallmark of the "special" Aliev-Medvedev relationship between 2008-2010. Putin does not do "cosy" very well and prefers to come to the point. He has made his position clear.

Azerbaijan is now trying to reposition itself. Speaking this morning in Baku, Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov described as a rough joke the comments made by the Head of the CSTO Nikolay Bordyuzha in Yerevan last week that it was not permissible for Azerbaijan to shoot down civilian aircraft. Azimov said that Azerbaijan does not intend to shoot down civilian aircraft, but will ensure the implementation of the Chicago Convention on aviation. Azimov was also dismissive of the current work of the Minsk Group. He said that no progress has been made since 2010 and described the last meeting in Paris on 28 January as “unsatisfactory”. Whilst Azimov stopped short of attacking Russia directly there was implicit criticism in his words.

However the internal debate in the Baku leadership on relations with Russia continues. Various members of parliament over the last days have spoken about the need to solve any outstanding problems with Russia. There is within the Azerbaijani leadership a strong “pro Russia” lobby. Their position has however been weakened by recent Russian actions and failure of Russia to deliver on Azerbaijan’s expectations.

Azerbaijan has some cards to play still if it wants to. It may withdraw from the CIS, but this is considered highly unlikely. It may seek to annoy Russia by dancing closer to the western tune. This may also not be so convenient because of domestic political considerations. Its best cards remain in the field of energy where by expanding its independent line, especially on Caspian energy issues, Azerbaijan hopes it may get Russia to think again.

This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu.

photo: A stamp commemorating a meeting between President Putin and the late President Heidar Aliev in 2001.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular