To what extent have Azerbaijan's relations with Russia deteriorated? Commonspace.eu political editor discusses recent developments in relations between Azerbaijan and Russia and their long term impact.

Commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu

The Russian media last week reported that Russian president Putin had stopped the sale of anti aircraft missiles to Azerbaijan. The report connected the decision to Azerbaijani claims that it will shoot down aircraft trying to use the airport in Nagorno-Karabakh without its permission. It also referred to the failure of the negotiations between Azerbaijan and Russia on the Gabala Radar facility. The facility is now due to shut down this month.

These developments however reflect a deeper rift in Azerbaijani-Russian relations.

Whilst the first two presidents of post Soviet Azerbaijan, Abdulfaz Elcebey and Heidar Aliev, tried to create a distance between their country and Russia, the current president, Ilham Aliev has staked a lot on building a good personal rapport with the Russian leadership, and between the two states.

Whilst the first two presidents wanted to punish Russia for its pro Armenian stance in the latter's confrontation with Azerbaijan, the task of Ilham Aliev was to try to break that relationship and turn Azerbaijan into a privileged partner of Russia. This was always bound to be a difficult and tricky operation.

Azerbaijan itself is sensitive about its regained independence and has no wish to lose any of it. It is also jealous for its economic independence. Azerbaijan has been able to secure economic independence through its arrangements with western companies for the exploitation of its natural resources. This has irritated Russia but Azerbaijan has no wish to lose that either.

But more importantly, what Azerbaijan seeks from the relationship with Russia is support for its position on Nagorno-Karabakh. In this it has got none. Now the frustration is increasing and the strain on the relations between the two countries is starting to show.

Russia, directly and through the CSTO military alliance has become increasingly more visible in its support for Armenia. On Nagorno-Karabakh it conveniently hides behind the facade of the Minsk Group, enabling it ditch any Azerbaijani pressure. That process has now grinded to a halt.

Gone are the cosy meetings and skiing excursions in Sochi, which had become the hallmark of the "special" Aliev-Medvedev relationship between 2008-2010. Putin does not do "cosy" very well and prefers to come to the point. He has made his position clear.

Azerbaijan is now trying to reposition itself. Speaking this morning in Baku, Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov described as a rough joke the comments made by the Head of the CSTO Nikolay Bordyuzha in Yerevan last week that it was not permissible for Azerbaijan to shoot down civilian aircraft. Azimov said that Azerbaijan does not intend to shoot down civilian aircraft, but will ensure the implementation of the Chicago Convention on aviation. Azimov was also dismissive of the current work of the Minsk Group. He said that no progress has been made since 2010 and described the last meeting in Paris on 28 January as “unsatisfactory”. Whilst Azimov stopped short of attacking Russia directly there was implicit criticism in his words.

However the internal debate in the Baku leadership on relations with Russia continues. Various members of parliament over the last days have spoken about the need to solve any outstanding problems with Russia. There is within the Azerbaijani leadership a strong “pro Russia” lobby. Their position has however been weakened by recent Russian actions and failure of Russia to deliver on Azerbaijan’s expectations.

Azerbaijan has some cards to play still if it wants to. It may withdraw from the CIS, but this is considered highly unlikely. It may seek to annoy Russia by dancing closer to the western tune. This may also not be so convenient because of domestic political considerations. Its best cards remain in the field of energy where by expanding its independent line, especially on Caspian energy issues, Azerbaijan hopes it may get Russia to think again.

This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu.

photo: A stamp commemorating a meeting between President Putin and the late President Heidar Aliev in 2001.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)