The war of words between Yerevan and Baku has taken a dangerous turn. What is the end-game behind the tough language?

Commentary by commonspace.eu political editor

The war of words between Armenians and Azerbaijanis has been going on for years now. Sometimes it reaches new heights, at other times it abets. To some extent people have got used to it, and like other things that one gets used to, in many ways it stopped being important.

But something very bad has been happening in recent weeks and days. The vitriolic language is now being used by the two Presidents themselves. Recent statements by both President Sargsyan of Armenia and President Aliev of Azerbaijan are significant not only for the tough message that they conveyed, but also for an unfortunate use of words aimed at each other, and each other's countries. Sargsyan and Aliev are rational men, not given to either hysteria or impulse. This makes this development rather more ominous.

Some explain this as posturing towards domestic audiences, and indeed a lot of is that. But neither man is naïve not to understand that their speeches are read carefully on the other side as well. The legitimate question therefore arises, what is the end game here?

Everybody is aware that the peace process is in deadlock. International efforts to resolve the conflict between the two countries continue, but the process seems to be in a quagmire and it is not clear how the sides are going to be able to come out of that. In these circumstances there is a need for calm and caution.

Presidents Aliev and Sargsyan are likely to be leading their countries in the immediate future and for some time to come. Any peace negotiations to be meaningful will at some stage need to be conducted by the two of them personally. They must not therefore make this eventuality even more difficult than it presently is, or even impossible. That there are serious disagreements between the two sides is well known. These disagreements however can only be resolved by negotiations and the Presidents need to act in a way that will make these negotiations possible.

source: This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

photo: President Aliec and President Sargsyan in better times, shaking hands after one of their meetings several years ago.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

The ''Coalition of the  Willing''  of thirty five countries, has renewed its support of Ukriane, at a meeting in Kyiv, held on Ukraine's national day on 24 August, under the chairmanship of British Prime Minister,A ndy Burnham. Burnham has promised to keep up the pressure on Russia despite Moscow's "outrageous threats", on his first official visit to Ukraine as UK prime minister. Burnham met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing", set up by the UK and France under his predecessor Sir Keir Starmer. He said the coalition was "doing everything we can" while urging the US Congress to "ratchet up" economic pressure on Russia. The government has agreed to hand over blueprints for British-made components for the Scalp missile, a French version of the UK's Storm Shadow cruise missile - allowing Ukraine to produce the long-range weapon domestically. During the meeting with France and Ukraine, Burnham said allies were doing "everything we can" to "dig into our own stocks and help others dig into their stocks" of air defences to protect Ukraine. "This is the moment to keep up the pressure on Russia, the moment to squeeze their ability to fund this illegal war," Burnham said, praising the "strength" of the Ukrainian people. "Ukraine has been Europe's protector, not a drain on our security but the front line in keeping Europe safe." It comes after Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticised the UK's decision to share the missile blueprints. Peskov said it prevented "even the slightest progress" towards achieving peace. He told reporters on Monday that the Russian military was already gathering data to locate any missile production sites to destroy them. "Britain is involved in this war on the side of the Kyiv regime. Britain methodically and regularly adds fuel to the fire," he added. In response, Burnham said: "Who started the fire? That's the question, isn't it?" He added the issue of missile interceptors would be the main topic at the coalition of the willing meeting. Burnham chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing" in Kyiv Burnham has been reaffirming the UK's backing for Kyiv in the wake of escalating Russian strikes on Ukraine in recent weeks - including one on a shopping centre on Friday that killed at least 16 people. In a joint statement after the meeting, Burnham and co-chairs French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the group would aim to strength Kyiv's air defences "as a matter or urgent priority". They also condemned Moscow's "systemic and escalating strikes against Ukraine's cities, critical infrastructure and civilians" and pledged to "constrain Russia's war chest through sanctions and actions against the "shadow fleet". (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)