Vahan Hovhannisian - a rare type of Armenian politician who combined political astuteness and resolve, with great personal charm and wit.

The news of the death of Vahan Hovhannisian, Armenian politician and statesman, has saddened many in his country, as well as among Armenian communities abroad. Since 2013 Hovhannisian served as Armenia's Ambassador to Germany. But it was as a politician and de facto leader of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation - ARF - (also known as the Dashnaks Party) that Hovhannisian was best known. 

Hovhannisyan was born in Yerevan. In 1978, he graduated from the Moscow State Pedagogical University with degrees in history and archaeology. After serving in the Soviet Army from 1978 to 1980, he was a research assistant. From 1990 to 1992, he participated in the Nagorno-Karabakh War.

He was a member of the ARF Central Committee from 1990 to 1992 and a member of the ARF Bureau from 1992 to 1995. He was jailed from 1995 to 1998 together with other ARF members and officials. The president of the time Levon Ter Petrossian accused the ARF of planning to overthrow the government by force. He was released within days of the appointment of Robert Kocharian as President. From 1999 to 2013 he was a prominent member of the Armenian Parliament, serving as Chairman of various committees, including the Defence and Security Committee and, from 2003-2008 as Vice Speaker. In the presidential election held on February 19, 2008, Hovhannisyan, running as the ARF candidate, won 6.2% of the vote.

Hovhannissian was well known and respected among political cicrles in Western countries where he often visited as guest of Armenian diaspora communities. He was also an active participant in the Socialist International - the grouping of world centre left political parties, of which ARF is a long-standing member. He also for a number of years headed the Armenian Parliamentary delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

Vahan Hovhannisian was a rare type of Armenian politician who could combine political astuteness and  resolve with great personal charm and a good sense of humour. He held strong and sometimes controversial views on a number of issues, which he debated forcefully both in Armenia and in the international arena. He was particularly critical of Turkey, and campaigned for the recognition of the events in Anatolia in 1915 as genocide. He often adopted a pragmatic view on issues related to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He fought in the conflict in the early 1990s but was ready to sit with Azerbaijani politicians and discuss a solution to the conflict. His presence in mainstream Armenia politics was already missed in the last two years, since he left mainstream politics to become Ambassadort to Germany. The news of his death has saddenned many Armenians and others who knew him.

source: commonspace.eu.

photo: Vahan Hovhannisian, Armenian politician who died on 28 December  2014 (archive picture).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
International Election Observation Mission finds that Armenians were offered a genuine choice against a backdrop of direct foreign pressure and uneven campaign opportunities

International Election Observation Mission finds that Armenians were offered a genuine choice against a backdrop of direct foreign pressure and uneven campaign opportunities

Farah Karimi, Special Co-ordinator and leader of the short-term OSCE observer mission, said that: “The concentration of arrests and criminal prosecutions against opposition figures contributed to perceptions of selective justice, while a polarized media landscape, inflammatory rhetoric, misinformation, and persistent foreign pressure and interference challenged Armenia’s democratic resilience and the integrity of public debate. This underscores the importance of continued efforts to strengthen democratic institutions, safeguard fundamental freedoms, and foster public trust in democratic processes. ” Damien Cottier, Head of the delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, argued that “The Armenian elections took place in a particularly tense geopolitical context, with direct foreign interference. In particular, pressure and threats from Russian authorities reached an unprecedented and worrying level.” Janez Lenarčič, head of the election observation mission from the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, stated that “Armenia’s voters were given – and took – the opportunity to make a genuine choice in a professionally managed election process and a vibrant and pluralistic, if often highly polarized campaign. “Unfortunately, they had to make that choice against the backdrop of unprecedented foreign interference and pressure, in the form of punitive trade measures and day-by-day threats of further negative consequences contingent on which choice they made”.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)