A storm in a tea-cup....or? Azerbaijani pro government politicians attack Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum for reaching out to unrecognised entities.

An attempt by the Steering Committee of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum to find a formula which would allow bona fide non-governmental organisations from conflict areas such as Abkhazia or Transdnistria to take part in the work of the Forum has led to an angry protest from Elkhan Suleymanov, head of the Azerbaijani Euronest parliamentary delegation. Mr Suleymanov has written to the Forum accusing it of contradicting "the legal basis of relations of Eastern Partnership countries with the EU". Mr Suleymanov, has suggested that the initiative "is sabotage, and it may have successive, serious and heavy results in future, and at the same time is directed against the spirit and objectives of the EU's Eastern Partnership program"

In a similar vein, a pro government party in Azerbaijan, the United Azerbaijan Popular Front Party (not to be confused with the Azerbaijan Popular Front Party which is a main opposition Party) yesterday issued a statement attacking the decision of the NGO Forum. A statement by the Party, carried by the APA news agency, says that at a meeting in Yerevan on April 4-5 the Board of Directors of Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum "passed a decision supporting separatist regimes". The decision provides for the participation of NGOs operating in the unrecognized regions (Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transdnistria) in the fifth annual meeting of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum in Moldova, and on starting discussions in the National Platforms of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum to allocate 10 seats under the name of "Eastern Partnership regions".

In its statement the United APFP said that "the characterisation of occupied Azerbaijani territories as a separate entity under the name of 'Eastern Partnership region' and discussions over the participation of NGOs illegally operating in these regions in "Eastern Partnership" Civil Society Forum is tantamount to supporting occupation and encouraging separatism" and condemned it: "The United Azerbaijan Popular Front Party demands the annulment of this unlawful and provocative decision and urges Azerbaijani NGOs attending the Forum to take urgent measures in this regard", the Party added.

The Steering Commitee of the Eastern Partnership NGO Forum on its part issued a statement on its website in which it  "fully rejects these charges and explains in a reply to Mr Suleymanov's letter that it merely wants to avoid having non-governmental organizations from conflict areas excluded, for no fault of their own, from the work of the Civil Society Forum."

In a comment, commonspace.eu political editor said

"the incident can be regarded as a storm in a tea cup, with little significance in the wider scheme of things. However it reflects much bigger and more serious questions. There has in recent years been a contradiction in Azerbaijani policy towards engagement with the resident population of Nagorno-Karabakh. On the one hand the Azerbaijani side has supported meetings between people from the different communities of Karabakh - resident Armenians and displaced Azerbaijanis, even if they are held in third countries. On the other hand Azerbaijan continues with the policy of trying to isolate Karabakh from international contacts. The decision of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum to try to be inclusive and provide space for the participation of civil society activists from the unrecognised entities in the work of the Forum is a positive one, especially since it in no way refers to the unrecognised entities as independent, indeed referring to them as conflict regions. The Forum can be a safe space for interaction between civil society activists from across the conflict divide and its work should be welcome by all, and not criticised."

source: commonspace.eu with APA

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

In elections on both sides of the Atlantic, that are likely to have deep implications for their respective regions, one incumbent won, another lost. In Brazil, Latin America's biggest country, left-wing President Lula won a fourth term in office, defeating his right-wing challenger Flávio Bolsonaro. The 80-year-old, took just under 52% of the vote in a run-off on Sunday. Lula thanked cheering supporters in São Paulo and said he had defended Brazil's democracy. His opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro - who won the first round - says the result is "inexplicable" and called for it to be annulled. His father, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, is currently serving a jail sentence under house arrest for plotting a coup after losing the last election. This election was bitterly fought - and it bucks a wider regional trend towards right-wing leaders. On the other side of the Atlantic, in Serbia, long-standing leader Aleksandar Vučić has admitted defeat to the student-led protest movement in snap parliamentary elections. "We still do not have final results... it is clear that we have lost these elections," the right-wing populist leader said as he conceded late on Sunday. Preliminary figures from Serbia's election commission indicated a record high turnout, which commentators had suggested would favour the student movement. Celebrations erupted after Vučić conceded. Vučić called the snap elections after two years of protests triggered by the collapse of a train station canopy in the city of Novi Sad, which killed 16 and was seen as emblematic of corruption and negligence. Both election results are going to have a deep impact on their respective regions.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)