Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
South Ossetian leader calls for full integration with Russia.

South Ossetian leader calls for full integration with Russia.

15 December 2014

The South Ossetians want unity with Russia, and they want it now. Even Mr Putin may not be ready for that. Joseph Alexander Smith reports from Tbilisi on the latest from the leadership of the self-declared republic.

South Ossetia's president, Leonid Tibilov, has announced his country's offer of full 'integration into the Russian Federation' in a move that has angered Tbilisi. The offer was made to Moscow as part of consultations on a new treaty to be signed early next year between Russia and the breakaway territory.

Speaking to South Ossetian news outlet RES on December 10, Tibilov said "I have made a proposal that the future treaty should be considered over the range of direct entry of the Republic of South Ossetia into Russia to other forms that exist today in the world. There are many forms of political coexistence of states. I think, we will soon get the answer to this question."

Tibilov's announcement comes less than a month after Georgia's other breakaway territory, Abkhazia, signed a "treaty on alliance and strategic partnership" with Moscow on November 24. Tskhinvali has cited a security threat from Tbilisi as a principle concern to be addressed by the new treaty.

"The Georgian side, despite the change of government, has changed nothing in its aggressive policy" Tibilov told RES. "There is an active rearmament of the Georgian armed forces. For Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia are still the objects for a possible attack. As head of state, I am obliged to create conditions for our future generations to live in complete safety."

Tskhinvali's offer of integration with the Russian Federation drew strident condemnation from Tbilisi, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Davit Kereselidze slamming Tibilov's announcement as "destructive". Georgia's president Giorgi Margvelashvili accused Moscow of initiating the treaty for its own ends, saying on December 11 that "neither will the treaty ... strengthen the Russian ruble, nor will it increase oil prices. These problems won't be settled through signing the treaty with Tskhinvali."

The Kremlin, meanwhile, has rejected Georgia's complaints. "Relations between Russia and Abkhazia, Russia and South Ossetia - are relations between sovereign states" Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on December 5, ahead of the 30th round of Geneva talks which bring together Georgian, Russian, South Ossetian and Abkhaz representatives. "These relations are developed based on the principles of international law and infringe nobody's interests."

In November, the announcement that Abkhazia would be negotiating a new treaty with Moscow prompted accusations by the Georgian opposition that the government has softened its stance on Russia's "occupation" of its territories. A rally organized in Tbilisi by the opposition United National Movement (UNM) party of former president Mikheil Saakashvili brought thousands onto the streets to protest Russia's "annexation" of Abkhazia with some speakers labelling the government "collaborationist".

For Georgia, the signing of a new treaty would be yet another item to add its list of grievances against Tskhinvali and Moscow this year. Tensions escalated when a Georgian TV crew reporting from the administrative boundary line were briefly detained by Russian border guards for "violating the border of South Ossetia". Throughout May, Russian border guards detained a number Georgian villagers who had strayed across the administrative boundary while picking herbs.

On June 8, the territory held parliamentary elections in which acting Minister of Emergencies Anatoly Bibilov's United Ossetia party won a majority of seats in the 34 member assembly. United Ossetia had campaigned on a platform of 'reunification' with the Russian Federation, and promised voters a future referendum on this issue. Putin's special aide on relations with Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Vladislav Surkov, visited Tskhinvali later in June, but denied that there had been talk of a referendum.

Given the apparent appetite within South Ossetia for unification with Russia and the relatively speedy annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation earlier this year, some analysts are asking if and when the Kremlin will follow suit with South Ossetia.

source: Jospeh Alexander Smith filed this report from Tbilisi for commonspace.eu

image: The Ossetian flag and the Russian flag are often seen flying together in Tskhinvali. The picture shows young Ossetians celebrating the victory over Georgia in the August 2008 war. (archive picture)



 

Latest

Editor's choice
News
Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia
Trending

Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

26 October 2026
In elections on both sides of the Atlantic, that are likely to have deep implications for their respective regions, one incumbent won, another lost. In Brazil, Latin America's biggest country, left-wing President Lula won a fourth term in office, defeating his right-wing challenger Flávio Bolsonaro. The 80-year-old, took just under 52% of the vote in a run-off on Sunday. Lula thanked cheering supporters in São Paulo and said he had defended Brazil's democracy. His opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro - who won the first round - says the result is "inexplicable" and called for it to be annulled. His father, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, is currently serving a jail sentence under house arrest for plotting a coup after losing the last election. This election was bitterly fought - and it bucks a wider regional trend towards right-wing leaders. On the other side of the Atlantic, in Serbia, long-standing leader Aleksandar Vučić has admitted defeat to the student-led protest movement in snap parliamentary elections. "We still do not have final results... it is clear that we have lost these elections," the right-wing populist leader said as he conceded late on Sunday. Preliminary figures from Serbia's election commission indicated a record high turnout, which commentators had suggested would favour the student movement. Celebrations erupted after Vučić conceded. Vučić called the snap elections after two years of protests triggered by the collapse of a train station canopy in the city of Novi Sad, which killed 16 and was seen as emblematic of corruption and negligence. Both election results are going to have a deep impact on their respective regions.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut