Regional co-operation that works. Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey are setting an example on how regional co-operation can work in practice.

The third trilateral meeting of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia was held in Ganja, Azerbaijan on 19 February 2014.

Ahmet Davutoğlu, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Elmar Memmedyarov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan and Maia Panjikidze, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Georgia, discussed ways of developing regional cooperation.

The "Ganja Statement" which was signed at the end of the meeting reiterated the three countries support to each others' sovereignty and territorial integrity, and underlined the importance of  an early peaceful settlement of the conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh, as well as in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, on the basis of respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of internationally recognized borders of states, as well as relevant resolutions and decisions of the United Nations, OSCE and Council of Europe. Furthermore, the Foreign Ministers highlighted the importance of the successful implementation of large-scale energy projects, such as Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipeline, and the earliest completion of the construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway.

In the meeting it was also announced that the first summit of the Presidents of the three countries will be held in Georgia later this year.

Asked about the prospect of opening of the border between Turkey and Armenia, Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoğlu said that "full normalisation of relations between Turkey and Armenia will not be possible as long as Armenian occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh continues".

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that relations between Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan are now developing in all spheres, and are proving beneficial to all three. The leaders of the three countries are also fully committed to this process and are putting the time and effort for their success. The Ganja meeting was a good example of this. This regional relationship is underpinned by major joint infrastructural projects, initially supporting the energy sector, but which are now expanding in other spheres too. In this relationship the role of Georgia is pivitol, since it provides the physical link between Azerbaijan and Turkey. For Georgia the relationship has some complications since the Georgian government does not want to be seen ganging up with two Turkic nations against Armenia. For Georgia however the benefit is to big too be missed. There is also a feeling that the Armenian government has in the past been clumsy in the way it has approached regional issues, and it is now paying the price for this. Regional co--operation in the Caucasus will not be complete without Armenia, but this remains a far away prospect. Like many other issues in the region it depends on a solution to the Karabakh conflict and there is no expectation that this will happen soon.

 source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: The Foreign Ministers of Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan at their meeting in Ganja on 18 February 2014. (picture courtesy of the Turkish Foreign Ministry.)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)