Türkiye's Evolving South Caucasus Policy under Re-Elected Erdoğan

The South Caucasus has consistently occupied a pivotal position within Turkish foreign policy. This significance has been underscored by Türkiye's deepening influence in the region, a trend that has gained momentum especially in the wake of the Second Karabakh War. With the recent re-election of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to the Presidency of the country, it is certain that Ankara will continue its active engagement in the South Caucasus. However, a nuanced analysis is imperative to fully grasp the multi-pronged approach that Türkiye has adopted in its dealings with this region. This strategy involves complex engagements with Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia, offering a perspective through which the intricate web of geopolitical challenges can be unraveled.

In this op-ed for commonspace.eu, Simona Scotti says that "this dynamic foreign policy stance also underscores the significance of the South Caucasus in extending Turkish influence to Central Asia.  In recent years, the growing importance of this region has garnered significant attention, not only for Türkiye but also for Europe. Situated at the crossroads of continents, Central Asia has emerged as a hub of economic potential, strategic significance, and cultural exchange. Türkiye, with its historical ties and shared Turkic heritage, recognizes the value of strengthening its relations with Central Asian countries. In this endeavor, the South Caucasus instrumentally serves as a vital corridor that connects Türkiye to the heart of Central Asia, bridging the physical and logistical gaps that might otherwise hinder closer ties. Consequently, the South Caucasus assumes a pivotal role in Türkiye's efforts to foster deeper diplomatic, economic, and cultural connections with Central Asia, ultimately benefiting both Türkiye and Europe by promoting regional cooperation and diversification of partnerships."

Reshaping Turkish Leadership: Hakan Fidan's Appointment and Ankara's New Global Outlook

In the wake of the re-election victory, Hakan Fidan's rather surprise appointment as the new Minister of Foreign Affairs highlights the significant reshuffling of Turkish President Erdoğan's ministerial cabinet. Fidan's twelve-year tenure as the head of Türkiye's intelligence services, where he held the role of the country's foremost "spymaster", preceded his current position. Fidan's extensive experience in intelligence operations and national security has led many analysts to conclude that his appointment signals Ankara's intent to adopt a more assertive posture on both regional and global fronts.

Under Erdoğan's leadership in recent years, Türkiye has grown in influence in the South Caucasus. In this particular context, Fidan's appointment implies Türkiye's aspirations to cement its presence within the region and establish itself as a significant stakeholder in cooperation with Russia. Given Russia's dwindling regional influence amidst the ongoing conflict with Ukraine, this renewed strategy takes on even greater importance, and Türkiye is increasingly acknowledged as a noteworthy player capable of countering and challenging the influence of Russia.

Strengthening Ties with Azerbaijan

In a symbolic move, Erdoğan embarked on a visit to Azerbaijan on June 12th, just days after securing his re-election. Traditionally, the first foreign visit for a newly elected Turkish president is to the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, and Azerbaijan is the second destination. The choice to prioritize Azerbaijan highlights the strategic importance of the South Caucasus region in Türkiye's foreign policy portfolio. The visit to Azerbaijan was a testament to the deep-rooted bonds between the two Turkic nations, which were further reinforced  during and after the Second Karabakh War when Ankara offered a large political and military support to Baku.

Notably, the deployment of Turkish officers at the Joint Turkish-Russian Monitoring Center in Ağdam, established to monitor the violations of the ceasefire agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan, highlighted Türkiye's active role in the security of the South Caucasus This involvement solidifies Türkiye's position as a key player in the region. Russia’s decision to share duties in the monitoring center evidenced Moscow's acknowledgment of Türkiye's relevance in the South Caucasus, which goes against traditional expectations of Russian dominance in the area.

As for the ongoing crisis in Karabakh triggered by the closure of the Lachin corridor connecting the region to Armenia, Fidan expressed support for Azerbaijan's actions as a sovereign right of Baku. This vocal backing portrays Turkish allegiance to Azerbaijan as unwavering.

Türkey-Armenia Relations and Regional Realignment

The unexpected attendance of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at Erdoğan's inauguration ceremony went beyond a mere ceremonial gesture; it was a strategic maneuver that unveiled the shifting dynamics between Türkiye and Armenia, two countries historically marred by strained relations. By extending an invitation to the Armenian leader, Erdoğan not only recognized the importance of maintaining open channels of communication, but also signaled his country's willingness to bridge the historical divide that has long defined the Turkish-Armenian relations.

On the other hand, Pashinyan's decision to attend the inauguration ceremony carried significance from Armenia's perspective as well. Yerevan's presence at the event conveyed an aspiration to diversify its foreign relations beyond its traditional reliance on Russia. For Armenia, cultivating relations with Türkiye offers an avenue to reduce its overdependence on Moscow, which has historically played a dominant role in Armenian affairs. This strategic diversification aligns with Pashinyan's broader goal of steering Armenia towards a more independent foreign policy that safeguards its sovereignty and positions it as an active participant in regional dynamics. 

In late June, Pashinyan and Erdoğan had a breakthrough phone call. During the call, they extended greetings for their respective religious holidays and commented on the ongoing efforts to normalize bilateral relations. However, the key challenge in establishing relations between Armenia and Türkiye is the stance of Baku, and every effort Türkiye makes to improve relations with Armenia remains closely coordinated with Azerbaijan. Therefore, the normalization process between Ankara and Yerevan goes hand in hand with the one between Yerevan and Baku.

Türkiye-Georgia Nexus

The congratulatory message from Georgia's Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili to President Erdoğan upon his re-election underscores the pivotal nature of their bilateral relationship, encompassing economic, security, and strategic dimensions.

Türkiye's role as Georgia's main trading partner holds considerable economic significance. The substantial trade turnover exceeding $2.8 billion in 2022 underscores Türkiye's pivotal role in Georgia's economic landscape. This economic interdependence amplifies Türkiye's influence, as it plays a crucial role in supporting Georgia's economic growth and stability. The exchange of goods and services between the two nations forms the backbone of their partnership, fostering prosperity and mutual development.

However, the bilateral relationship extends far beyond economic considerations. Georgia's geographic proximity to Russia's sphere of influence amplifies the imperative for strong alliances to ensure its security and stability. Recognizing the strategic value of collaborating with a NATO member and regional heavyweight like Türkiye, Georgia seeks to fortify its security posture through this partnership. Türkiye's active involvement in NATO further accentuates its role as a guarantor of regional security, making it a crucial ally for Georgia in mitigating potential threats. Moreover, Türkiye's steadfast support for Georgia's aspirations to join NATO adds another layer of significance to their bilateral relations. 

A Strategic Interplay

Erdoğan's post-re-election foreign policy approach towards the South Caucasus encapsulates Türkiye's multifaceted strategies. As Türkiye navigates the complex South Caucasus geopolitical landscape, its evolving policy signals a proactive and dynamic engagement with the region. This approach not only enhances Türkiye's regional influence but also underscores its ambition to secure a broader role on the global stage, leveraging opportunities presented by shifting international dynamics. The region's evolving alliances and partnerships are likely to shape the South Caucasus' future trajectory and its place in the broader arena of international relations.   

This dynamic foreign policy stance also underscores the significance of the South Caucasus in extending Turkish influence to Central Asia.  In recent years, the growing importance of this region has garnered significant attention, not only for Türkiye but also for Europe. Situated at the crossroads of continents, Central Asia has emerged as a hub of economic potential, strategic significance, and cultural exchange. Türkiye, with its historical ties and shared Turkic heritage, recognizes the value of strengthening its relations with Central Asian countries. In this endeavor, the South Caucasus instrumentally serves as a vital corridor that connects Türkiye to the heart of Central Asia, bridging the physical and logistical gaps that might otherwise hinder closer ties. Consequently, the South Caucasus assumes a pivotal role in Türkiye's efforts to foster deeper diplomatic, economic, and cultural connections with Central Asia, ultimately benefiting both Türkiye and Europe by promoting regional cooperation and diversification of partnerships.

source: Simona Scotti is an expert on the South Caucasus, Turkish security policies, energy and connectivity. She contributed this op-ed for commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.