Opinion: The story of the two Mehmans

The arrest in Baku of the "Doyen" of South Caucasus journalists has fueled speculation about what is going on in Azerbaijan. In this op-ed for commonspace.eu Dennis Sammut discusses the recent arrest of veteran Azerbaijani journalist Mehman Alieyev.

The authorities in Azerbaijan in the last days moved in against the last significant independent media outlet in the country, the Turan News Agency, arresting and charging its veteran Managing Director, Mehman Aliyev with tax evasion. He has now been sent to three months pre-trail detention.

Mehman Aliyev was one of the first independent journalists to emerge in the South Caucasus in the late 1980s, establishing the Turan news Agency in 1990 - an outlet that has covered the regions trails and tribulations since. His skills, composure and general gravitas earned him earlier-on the title of "Doyen" of South Caucasus journalists. This explains the outcry that followed his arrest, and why even the government-friendly "National Press Council of Azerbaijan" felt it necessary to call on President Ilham Aliyev to intervene in the case.

This is not the first time that the Azerbaijani government has shown an authoritarian streak. Journalists and media outlets have been a favourite target. Another Mehman - the young photo-journalist Mehman Husseynov -  was imprisoned earlier this year, after making claims that he had been violently abused whilst under police interrogation. The two Mehmans are very different from each other, yet between them they cover the whole spectrum of what can be called independent opinion in Azerbaijan - stretching across generations, style, and even in the means they use to communicate their message. Their imprisonment closes the circle but it does not square it.

In explaining what is going on in Azerbaijan there are three schools of thought.

The first, spearheaded by most of the country's opposition forces old and new, insists that the country is a dictatorship led by a blood-thirsty and corrupt leadership. They have been out in force on social media in the last days criticising the west for not calling a spade a spade, and for not cutting off relations with the Azerbaijani leadership.

The second, made up of more moderate elements, takes a more nuanced approach. It says that opinion within the Azerbaijani leadership is much more divided than it looks, and that President Ilham Aliyev sits on top of a fractured political system that pulls the country in different directions, with him having as a necessity to balance between these different interest to survive. This, they say, explains the contradictions in Baku's actions. Whilst the President and his wife push a modernisation agenda with a balanced foreign policy, others are trying to hang on to outdated models of political and economic governance. They think more western engagement with Azerbaijan, not less, is necessary.

A third school insists that the situation is much more complicated because behind some of Baku's actions, even if not all, is an unprecedented level of Russian pressure. The reconstruction of the "Russian world", (to say Soviet Union is politically incorrect even in Moscow these days), is the top priority of President Putin at the moment. Most of the post-Soviet states are now either firmly in, (Armenia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are considered in this category despite their obvious discomfort), or firmly out, (the Baltic States and Georgia). In Ukraine, the battle is being fought out in front of the whole world on the streets of the towns and villages of the Donbass.

Azerbaijan however is the one place where Putin feels he is closest to making progress, but where victory has proven elusive. The Russians are playing all the cards at their disposal in Azerbaijan, short of sending in the Army. Russian pressure on President Aliyev is huge. The "Party of Russia" within the Azerbaijani leadership remains significant, even though Ilham Aliyev, and his father Heidar before him, have carefully and cleverly balanced it finely. However, for this third school, the reasons for the arrest of Mehman Aliyev is most likely Russian pressure on Azerbaijan to clamp down on all signs of dissent and independent thinking, since this threatens Moscow's own domestic model as well as its expansionist agenda. It was now Mehman Aliyev's time to be fed to the bears.

Ironically, it is therefore quite possible that the arrest of the two Mehmans is perceived, outside Azerbaijan at least, not as a sign of President's Aliyev government toughness, but rather of its weakness.

Dennis Sammut is a long-time analyst of the South Caucasus and wider Eurasia. He contributed this op-ed to commonspace.eu dennis@links-dar.org

photo collage: Mehman Alieyev and Mehman Husseynov

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, delivered an important policy speech on Friday 3 May during which he did a wide tour d'horizon of the current global situation and the challenges it flags up for Europe and for the world. Speaking in an academic setting, delivering the Dahrendorf Lecture at St Antony's College Oxford, Borrell spoke of a world where there is much more confrontation than co-operation, where there is more polarity and less multilateralism, Borrell spoke about the diminishing role of the United States as world hegemon and the rise of China. We, Europeans, wanted to create in our neighbourhood a ring of friends. Instead of that, what we have today is a ring of fire. A ring of fire coming from the Sahel to the Middle East, the Caucasus and now in the battlefields of Ukraine, the High Representative said: Speaking on Russia, Borrell said  Under Putin’s leadership, Russia has returned to the imperialist understanding of the world. Imperial Russia from the Tzar times and the Soviet empire times have been rehabilitated by Putin dreaming of a former size and influence.  "It was Georgia in 2008. It was Crimea in 2014. We did not see, or we did not want to see, the evolution of Russia under Putin’s watch. Even though Putin himself had warned us at the Munich Security Conference in 2007. It is important to re-read what Putin said in 2007 at the Munich [Security] Conference that I am afraid that nobody wanted to hear or to understand." Borell described Putin as "an existential threat". In his speech Borell dwelt on the wars in Ukraine and in Gaza. "Now, we have two wars. And we, Europeans, are not prepared for the harshness of the world." The High Representative said that the way of living of the Europeans, "this best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that the humanity has never been able to invent, is certainly in danger. And in order to face these challenges, I think that we have to work on three dimensions: Principles, Cooperation and Strength."

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, delivered an important policy speech on Friday 3 May during which he did a wide tour d'horizon of the current global situation and the challenges it flags up for Europe and for the world. Speaking in an academic setting, delivering the Dahrendorf Lecture at St Antony's College Oxford, Borrell spoke of a world where there is much more confrontation than co-operation, where there is more polarity and less multilateralism, Borrell spoke about the diminishing role of the United States as world hegemon and the rise of China. We, Europeans, wanted to create in our neighbourhood a ring of friends. Instead of that, what we have today is a ring of fire. A ring of fire coming from the Sahel to the Middle East, the Caucasus and now in the battlefields of Ukraine, the High Representative said: Speaking on Russia, Borrell said  Under Putin’s leadership, Russia has returned to the imperialist understanding of the world. Imperial Russia from the Tzar times and the Soviet empire times have been rehabilitated by Putin dreaming of a former size and influence.  "It was Georgia in 2008. It was Crimea in 2014. We did not see, or we did not want to see, the evolution of Russia under Putin’s watch. Even though Putin himself had warned us at the Munich Security Conference in 2007. It is important to re-read what Putin said in 2007 at the Munich [Security] Conference that I am afraid that nobody wanted to hear or to understand." Borell described Putin as "an existential threat". In his speech Borell dwelt on the wars in Ukraine and in Gaza. "Now, we have two wars. And we, Europeans, are not prepared for the harshness of the world." The High Representative said that the way of living of the Europeans, "this best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that the humanity has never been able to invent, is certainly in danger. And in order to face these challenges, I think that we have to work on three dimensions: Principles, Cooperation and Strength."