Opinion: A resumption of the Iran nuclear deal is also good for Armenia

Reports from Vienna suggest that Iran and the world powers are close to agreeing on restoring the Iran Nuclear Deal. For a moment it appeared that the negotiations were going to get entangled in the current Ukraine crisis, but it appears that Iran has dissuaded Russia from doing so. In this op-ed for commonspace.eu Benyamin Poghosyan says a deal would be good for neighbouring countries like Armenia who are keen to exploit trade opportunities with Iran.

When President Trump pulled the US out of the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, and launched his “maximum pressure campaign” against Tehran, the other signatories of the nuclear deal did not join the US and took steps to save the deal. The EU even launched a special trade mechanism – INSTEX - to facilitate non-USD and non-SWIFT transactions with Iran, while China continued to buy Iranian oil. The re-imposed US sanctions have significantly worsened the economic situation in Iran but have failed to reach the main goal – to force Tehran to change its regional policy and give up on its ballistic missile program.

During the 2020 Presidential campaign, the future of the Iran nuclear deal was one of the points of contention. Trump argued for the continuation of its maximum pressure campaign, while Biden promised to take steps to restore the deal. After taking office in January 2021, the US started negotiations in Vienna to restore the nuclear deal. Many experts hoped that negotiations would finish by the Summer 2021 Presidential elections in Iran. However, this did not happen, and the newly elected President Raisi asked for a pause. Negotiations were resumed in November 2021, and sides were close to striking the deal.

The launch of the Russian “special military operation” in Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and the heavy sanctions imposed by the US, UK, EU, and their partners on Russia have negatively impacted the negotiation process. The almost complete rupture of relations between Russia and the West complicated the possibility of a combined effort by Russia and Western countries to reach a deal on Iran. Immediately after the start of the war, Iranian officials blamed NATO for the crisis, simultaneously calling for an immediate ceasefire and a “political and democratic solution." However, despite Iran’s positive attitude towards Russia, in early March 2022, Russia demanded "written guarantees" from the United States that wide-ranging Western sanctions targeting Moscow would not affect its economic and military cooperation with Iran. The US has promptly rejected Russia's demand, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken saying that such demands are irrelevant and that sanctions on Russia have nothing to do with the Iran nuclear deal. Iranian reaction was more cautious, as Iran said it was seeking clarification from the Russian side on their demands. However, Tehran was concerned that the nuclear deal might become a hostage to the Russia – West confrontation. Meanwhile, Western powers warned Moscow against wrecking the almost completed deal on bringing the United States and Iran back into compliance with the accord.

"The window of opportunity is closing. We call on all sides to make the decisions necessary to close this deal now and on Russia not to add extraneous conditions to its conclusion," Britain, France, and Germany said in a joint statement to the UN nuclear watchdog's 35-nation board of governors.

Later, Russia provided more details on its position, arguing that while speaking about a waiver to Western sanctions in its relations with Iran, it meant only a narrow circle of nuclear-related activities, such as the transportation to Russia of a volume of enriched uranium. However, there is a lack of clarity as to what Russia wants, and whether Russia is seeking to use a nuclear deal as a bargaining chip in its overall relations with the West. Russian foreign minister Lavrov met with his Iranian counterpart in Moscow on March 15, 2022. He stated that Russia valued Iran’s constructive approach to the situation in Ukraine and emphasized that Russia fully supported the restoration of the Iran nuclear deal. Meanwhile, he added that from the Russian perspective, the OPEC+ is the best mechanism to prevent fluctuations in the oil prices as Iranian oil would enter the world market after the restoration of the deal. Russian and Iranian foreign ministers met again on March 30, 2022, in China while attending the summit of Afghanistan's neighboring countries. Both ministers emphasized their readiness to expand economic cooperation despite the “illegal sanctions” imposed by “unfriendly nations” and discussed the situation in Ukraine and Afghanistan in-depth. Moscow wants to alleviate Iran’s concerns and send a clear message that it will not “sabotage” the deal to reach its narrow interests. Meanwhile, some experts argue that the nuclear deal may be restored even without Russia, which will be a tough diplomatic blow to Moscow.

Meanwhile, it should be emphasized that the new Russian demands are not the only obstacles to restoring the Iran nuclear deal. Another significant point of contention is Iran’s demand to remove IRGC from the US State Department foreign terrorist organization list and cancel sanctions imposed on some individuals.

The ups and downs in the negotiations to restore the Iran nuclear deal are closely watched by Iran’s neighboring countries, including Armenia. Yerevan welcomed the deal in 2015, hoping that it would allow Armenia to attract foreign companies, which will produce in Armenia and export to Iran. Armenia opened a free economic zone in Meghri close to the Armenia – Iran border in December 2017, hoping to foster its economic cooperation with Iran. The US withdrawal from the deal dashed Armenia’s hopes. However, the signature of the interim free trade deal between Iran and the Eurasian Economic Union, and negotiations towards establishing the permanent free trade deal, reignited Yerevan's hopes that after the nuclear deal's restoration, the Meghri free economic zone may finally start to function. As the war in Ukraine wrought havoc on Russia – West relations and Armenia braced itself for the challenging economic consequences, the restoration of Iran’s nuclear deal might present Armenia with some new opportunities.

source: Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and Chairman of the Centre for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.
photo: A session of the Iran nuclear talks in Vienna (archive picture)
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.